1994
DOI: 10.1007/s001250050120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of insulin concentration, subcutaneous fat thickness and skin temperature on subcutaneous insulin absorption in healthy subjects

Abstract: Summary Subcutaneous insulin absorption kineticswere assessed in 50 healthy study subjects (21 female, 29 male; age 26 + 3 years, BMI 22.5 + 1.8 kg/m2; mean + SD) during 45 min after periumbilical injection of soluble human U40-or U100-insulin (0.15 IU/kg). Subcutaneous fat thickness was measured by ultrasound, and skin temperature at the injection site was registered. Serum insulin concentrations increased within 30 min from basal values of 37 + 15 to 140 + 46 pmol/1 after U40-insulin and from 36 + 10 to 116 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
52
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in accordance with previous observations in subjects with overt obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) [1][2][3], high BMI, WHR and WC were significantly associated with delays in absorption and onset of action when insulin was administered by conventional insulin pen. However, in accordance with previous observations in subjects with overt obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) [1][2][3], high BMI, WHR and WC were significantly associated with delays in absorption and onset of action when insulin was administered by conventional insulin pen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in accordance with previous observations in subjects with overt obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) [1][2][3], high BMI, WHR and WC were significantly associated with delays in absorption and onset of action when insulin was administered by conventional insulin pen. However, in accordance with previous observations in subjects with overt obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) [1][2][3], high BMI, WHR and WC were significantly associated with delays in absorption and onset of action when insulin was administered by conventional insulin pen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A high body mass index (BMI) may considerably delay the absorption rate and onset of action of regular insulin [1][2][3] and possibly that of rapid-acting insulin analogs. A high body mass index (BMI) may considerably delay the absorption rate and onset of action of regular insulin [1][2][3] and possibly that of rapid-acting insulin analogs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study also confirms that VJ7 is absorbed faster and has an earlier onset of action than a rapid-acting insulin analogue in patients with type 1 diabetes as has been shown before with VJ25 in healthy subjects [6]. Thus it seems that larger differences in concentration are necessary to see the expected slower absorption and longer duration of action with the higher concentration [11]. However, in a previous glucose clamp study with U-40 versus U-100 regular human insulin, no significant differences in PK were observed [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast to VJ25, VJ7 is a familiar presentation of insulin in that it is at a 100 U/ml (U-100) concentration and does not need to be reconstituted. While another study did show small differences in PK between U-40 and U-100 regular human insulin, the effect on blood glucose concentrations were similar between both concentrations [11]. The bioequivalence of the two VIAject ® preparations might not have been expected because of the different concentrations (U-25 vs. U-100).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The patient-related factors with an influence on absorption kinetics include body posture (Hildebrandt et al, 1985b), temperature of the skin (Koivisto et al, 1981;Thow et al, 1989;Sindelka et al, 1994), subcutaneous fat thickness (Sindelka et al, 1994), exercise of the muscle that underlies the site of insulin injection (Dandona et al, 1978;Koivisto and Felig, 1978;Susstrunk et al, 1982;Fernqvist et al, 1986), and massage of the injection site Dillon, 1983;Linde 1986;Linde and Philip, 1989). Factors originating in the patient.…”
Section: Injection Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%