2018
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of initial immunosuppression on long-term kidney transplant outcome in immunological low-risk patients

Abstract: Background Few studies have evaluated the effect of different immunosuppressive strategies on long-term kidney transplant outcomes. Moreover, as they were usually based on historical data, it was not possible to account for the presence of pretransplant donor-specific human-leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA), a currently recognized risk marker for impaired graft survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate to what extent frequently used initial immunosuppressive therapies increase graft su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graft survival censored for death is significantly better for the elderly group as compared to the young and middle aged groups ( Figure 2C ) explaining the similar all-cause graft survival curves between age groups with the first 10 years after transplantation. Of note, the type of maintenance immune suppressive regimen (in particular ciclosporin or tacrolimus-based) was not associated with graft survival in the different age groups, in accordance with a previous analysis of the total PROCARE cohort ( 19 ). The majority of young recipients received a graft from a living donor as opposed to the elderly group and most of the deceased donor kidneys were from brain death donors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Graft survival censored for death is significantly better for the elderly group as compared to the young and middle aged groups ( Figure 2C ) explaining the similar all-cause graft survival curves between age groups with the first 10 years after transplantation. Of note, the type of maintenance immune suppressive regimen (in particular ciclosporin or tacrolimus-based) was not associated with graft survival in the different age groups, in accordance with a previous analysis of the total PROCARE cohort ( 19 ). The majority of young recipients received a graft from a living donor as opposed to the elderly group and most of the deceased donor kidneys were from brain death donors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this comprehensive, retrospective CTS analysis, we compared the impact of Tac- and CsA-based immunosuppression on the outcome of European KT recipients aged ≥60 y. Our findings are in line with previous studies‚ which, in general, did not report any significant effect of the type of CNI on short- or long-term death-censored graft survival or mortality; 12,17-23 however, these studies focused on comparatively young recipients with a mean age of approximately 45 y, whereas recipients aged ≥60 y were underrepresented. 17 We now analyzed >30 000 European kidney transplantations specifically from this growing group of elderly KT recipients and found that the choice of CNI did not have any significant impact on graft loss and patient mortality in these patients either.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Regarding the risk of rejection treatment, we report a significantly reduced risk for recipients on Tac therapy, an observation which is also similar to results of previous studies in younger recipients. 6,18,20 This effect was confirmed in almost all subgroups. Importantly, we demonstrated that the association between Tac-based immunosuppression and a reduced risk of rejection treatment was significant for transplants with both 0 to 3 and 4 to 6 HLA mismatches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Initial immunosuppression was categorized as prednisolone/cyclosporine with or without mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with or without interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA) versus prednisolone/tacrolimus/MMF with or without IL2RA based on a previous study on the complete PROCARE cohort. 12 Graft function was categorized on direct or delayed function, and HLA mismatches were divided into equal categories.…”
Section: Data Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%