Effect of Initial Conditions on the Pore Structure and Bimodal Soil–Water Characteristic Curve of Compacted Granite Residual Soil

Abstract

Granite residual soil typically forms complex pore structures and exhibits high water sensitivity due to physical and chemical weathering processes. Changes in initial compaction conditions significantly affect the mechanical and hydraulic properties of in situ granite residual soil subgrades, with these variations fundamentally related to changes in pore structure and soil–water characteristics. This study investigates the pore structure and bimodal soil–water characteristic curve (SWCC) of a compacted granite residual soil through laboratory tests and mercury intrusion porosimetry tests. Nine initial conditions were selected based on potential in situ compaction conditions of subgrades, and their effects on the pore size distribution (PSD) and SWCC were thoroughly analyzed. The results show strong correlations between bimodal pore structure and SWCC. The size and volume of inter-aggregate pores exhibit noticeable changes with initial conditions, affecting SWCC within the low and middle suction range. Conversely, the intra-aggregate pores, which constitute over 60% of the pore structures, remain nearly intact across different initial conditions, resulting in similar SWCCs within the high suction range. As the compaction energy increases, the inter-aggregate pores are compressed and lead to a higher water retention capacity. In addition, as the compaction water content increases, the SWCC becomes less sensitive to compaction energy after the aggregates in the pore structure are fully saturated. Additionally, a three-dimensional bimodal SWCC equation is proposed and validated using test data with an R2 value above 0.98. These findings offer valuable insights for the design and quality control of granite residual soil subgrades.

Practice of Improving Saline–Alkali Soil with Bio-Humic Acid

“…Notably, the organic matter was higher than the amount of bio-humic acid soil amendment added to the surface soil. There are two possible reasons for these results [13,14]. On the one hand, this may have occurred because the bio-humic acid soil amendment itself was organic matter, which would increase the content of soil organic matter.…”