1967
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(67)90063-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of inhibitors of carbohydrate metabolism on the development of preimplantation mouse embryos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether this is by reversible inhibition of the electron transport chain by NO at the level of cytochrome c oxidase or the persistent inhibition of complex I, via ONOO --mediated oxidation of sulfhydryl groups (Riobo et al, 2001) has not been investigated. However, it is unlikely that NONOate inhibits the electron transport chain completely because ATP production via the Krebs cycle is essential for embryo development (Thomson, 1967;Auerbach and Brinster, 1968). It is plausible that NO produced either by the embryo or by surrounding cells of the reproductive tract is important for the regulation of blastocyst oxygen consumption and that elevated levels of NO in vivo may cause excessive inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation which could compromise development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether this is by reversible inhibition of the electron transport chain by NO at the level of cytochrome c oxidase or the persistent inhibition of complex I, via ONOO --mediated oxidation of sulfhydryl groups (Riobo et al, 2001) has not been investigated. However, it is unlikely that NONOate inhibits the electron transport chain completely because ATP production via the Krebs cycle is essential for embryo development (Thomson, 1967;Auerbach and Brinster, 1968). It is plausible that NO produced either by the embryo or by surrounding cells of the reproductive tract is important for the regulation of blastocyst oxygen consumption and that elevated levels of NO in vivo may cause excessive inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation which could compromise development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing the O 2 level to 0.5% prevented even wildtype eight-cell embryos from developing past the morula stage (supplementary material Fig. S3B), because mouse preimplantation development requires some oxygen (Thomson, 1967). However, reducing the oxygen level in embryo cultures to 5% (the level in utero) has been reported to improve preimplantation development (Lawitts and Biggers, 1993; Erbach et al, 1994;Nagy et al, 2003).…”
Section: Tead4mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, it is likely that the oxygen level in the female reproductive tract is kept hypoxic relative to the atmospheric oxygen level (3-5% versus 21%) (Gardner and Leese, 1990) in order to minimize ROS production. However, some oxygen is required, because OXPHOS is essential for blastocoel development (Thomson, 1967). Thus, embryos must carefully balance energy production, energy usage and ROS production (termed 'energy homeostasis'), because failure to do so results in increased oxidative stress, changes in the intracellular redox potential and impaired biosynthetic potential, all of which are detrimental to development (Harvey et al, 2002;Burton et al, 2003;Dumollard et al, 2007;Van Blerkom, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevailing thought is that reduction in [O 2 ] during culture results in reduction of ROS from oxidative processes, such as OXPHOS; this is supported by the observations that inclusion of antioxidants in the culture media ameliorates oxidative stress and improves development. However, O 2 itself appears to be required for preimplantation development as inhibition of OXPHOS or in vitro culture at 1% O 2 inhibits development (Kaneko & DePamphilis, 2013;Thomson, 1967), although this sensitivity may depend on species (Brison & Leese, 1994;Kane & Buckley, 1977). As mentioned earlier, the need for low levels of O 2 by the cleavage-stage embryos likely reflects their primary reliance on monocarboxylates, amino acids, and/or FAs for energy, which can only generate ATP through OXPHOS, although other oxidative processes such as demethylation of methylated CpG dinucleotides by ten-eleven translocation (TET) proteins (Li & Zhang, 2014) cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Effects Of Oxygen and Amino Acids In The Culture Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%