2013
DOI: 10.3233/jrs-130592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of infection control strategy on knowledge, attitude and practice towards hepatitis B transmission and prevention in vulnerable populations

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) and hematological patients needing blood/ blood product transfusion are particularly vulnerable to blood born infections (BBI) including viral hepatitis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of these target groups regarding viral hepatitis B (HBV) transmission and its change with implementing infection control policy and procedures. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire with closed questions was used to evaluate KAP including vaccination status in 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Success in increasing vaccination may result from a combination of the following interventions: (1) directly contacting non-vaccinated populations [ 65 ]; (2) strengthening knowledge and awareness of vaccinations [ 66 ]; (3) improving comfort and access to vaccinations [ 67 ]; (4) targeting specific populations (e.g., HCW) [ 68 ]; (5) mandated vaccinations or sanctions against non-vaccination [ 69 ]; (6) engaging religious or other influential leaders to promote vaccinations [ 70 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Success in increasing vaccination may result from a combination of the following interventions: (1) directly contacting non-vaccinated populations [ 65 ]; (2) strengthening knowledge and awareness of vaccinations [ 66 ]; (3) improving comfort and access to vaccinations [ 67 ]; (4) targeting specific populations (e.g., HCW) [ 68 ]; (5) mandated vaccinations or sanctions against non-vaccination [ 69 ]; (6) engaging religious or other influential leaders to promote vaccinations [ 70 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%