2010
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181b71a4a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Induced Alkalosis on the Power-Duration Relationship of "All-out" Exercise

Abstract: Despite notably enhanced blood-buffering capacity, NaHCO3 ingestion had no effect on the W', the CP, or the overall performance during 3 min of all-out cycling. It is concluded that preexercise blood alkalosis had no influence on the power-duration relationship for all-out exercise.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

8
46
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(119 reference statements)
8
46
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, ingestion of NaHCO3 following the initial exercise bout may be more appropriate to maximise post-exercise acid-base balance recovery compared to prior ingestion. Similarly, the use of the recovery window in the were still rising 60 min post NaHCO3 ingestion, which agrees with previous research displaying peak alkalosis occurs later than the time frame adopted in the present study (Carr et al, 2011b;Siegler et al, 2010). Therefore, if the recovery window was larger we may have seen a more superior state of alkalosis, and based on this premise, resulted in a more profound effect of NaHCO3 Gough et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, ingestion of NaHCO3 following the initial exercise bout may be more appropriate to maximise post-exercise acid-base balance recovery compared to prior ingestion. Similarly, the use of the recovery window in the were still rising 60 min post NaHCO3 ingestion, which agrees with previous research displaying peak alkalosis occurs later than the time frame adopted in the present study (Carr et al, 2011b;Siegler et al, 2010). Therefore, if the recovery window was larger we may have seen a more superior state of alkalosis, and based on this premise, resulted in a more profound effect of NaHCO3 Gough et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The NaHCO 3 -ingestion resulted in an elevated blood buffering status prior to the first Wingate test, with that elevation being sustained throughout the following WTs. The results of the present study, in agreement with other investigations (Parry-Billings and MacLaren 1986; Stephens et al 2002;Vanhatalo et al 2010;Zabala et al 2008), demonstrate no ergogenic effect of sodium bicarbonate ingestion on high-intensity exercise performance, despite significant blood alkalosis. Other studies have reported performance improvements, due to an ergogenic benefit of NaHCO 3 -supplementation during multiple bouts of high-intensity exercise (Bishop and Claudius 2005;Bishop et al 2004;Douroudos et al 2006;Price et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, the highest value of cycling work and peak power were achieved with that dose. For the present investigation we chose a dose of 0.3 g kg -1 body weight, extensively used previously (Requena et al 2005;Siegler and Hirscher 2010;Stephens et al 2002;Vanhatalo et al 2010;Zabala et al 2008) and proposed to be the optimal amount to be ergogenic (Hollidge-Horvat et al 2000;Linderman and Fahey 1991;McNaughton et al 2008;Stephens et al 2002) and the most appropriate to obtain a blood alkalosis in human without side effects (i.e., gastrointestinal distress) (Vanhatalo et al 2010). Thus, the observed lack of improvement in WT performance in the present study may consequently not be due to the sodium bicarbonate administration protocol used, and perhaps the improvements observed in other studies (Douroudos et al 2006;Price et al 2003;Siegler and Hirscher 2010) may be partly due to the type of ingestion (drink solution).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low active recovery intensity used in this study was an attempt to increase muscle blood flow while not interrupting PCr resynthesis, since those stores are crucial for subsequent efforts [24, 25]. When considering that the half time recovery for PCr is rarely superior to 90 s during a passive recovery [26], we expected a more than optimum reload of PCr in the current study for both active and passive interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%