2018
DOI: 10.3126/kuset.v12i1.21567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of incubation temperatures on mycelial growth, conidial features and density of Stemphylium botryosum Walr isolates

Abstract: The cultural and morphological variability of Stemphylium botryosum Walr was studied with five isolates viz. isolate 1 (Stb-I1), isolate 2 (Stb-I2), isolate 3 (Stb- I3), isolate 4 (Stb-I4) and isolate 5 (Stb-I5) collected from Parsa, Rautahat, Dang, Banke and Chitwan districts of Nepal respectively during 2011-2012 crop season with Completely Randomized Design (CRD) maintaining 3 replications at Plant Pathology Laboratory of Grain Legumes Research Program (GLRP), Rampur, Chitwan. Single spore isolation techniq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…has relied mainly on morphological characteristics including conidium shape, size, septation, length/width ratio and ornamentation (Simmons, 1969). However, high variability of species in culture and plasticity in host preference for these fungi have made it difficult to identify isolates to species (Chowdhury et al, 2015;Poursafar et al, 2016;Subash and Saraswati, 2016). Molecular tools have been widely implemented for accurate differentiation between Stemphylium spp., with species identification relying on sequence analyses of various DNA regions (Câmara et al, 2002;Inderbitzin et al, 2009;Woudenberg et al, 2017) and metabolite profiling (Andersen et al, 1995;Olsen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has relied mainly on morphological characteristics including conidium shape, size, septation, length/width ratio and ornamentation (Simmons, 1969). However, high variability of species in culture and plasticity in host preference for these fungi have made it difficult to identify isolates to species (Chowdhury et al, 2015;Poursafar et al, 2016;Subash and Saraswati, 2016). Molecular tools have been widely implemented for accurate differentiation between Stemphylium spp., with species identification relying on sequence analyses of various DNA regions (Câmara et al, 2002;Inderbitzin et al, 2009;Woudenberg et al, 2017) and metabolite profiling (Andersen et al, 1995;Olsen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, estas características han sido insuficientes en la correcta identificación de las especies ya que se pudo verificar superposición de los valores entre diferentes especies, incluso puede ser variable aún en una misma especie. Las características morfológicas de los conidios y las colonias están sujetas a variaciones de condiciones de crecimiento de los cultivos; tales como luz, temperatura, medio de cultivo, entre otras (Neergaard 1945;Joly 1964;Leach & Aragaki 1970;Câmara et al 2002;Hosen et al 2009;Chowdhury et al 2015;Subash & Saraswati 2016). Al contrario que los caracteres morfológicos observables, el análisis de secuencias del ácido desoxirribonucleico (ADN), no está sujeto a modificaciones de condiciones de cultivo, ni a clasificaciones empíricas del ser humano (Pei et al, 2010;Woudenberg et al, 2017).…”
Section: Identificación Morfológica Y Molecularunclassified