2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of increasing anode surface area on the performance of a single chamber microbial fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
78
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
78
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several anode materials have been recently tested in MECs, including graphite granules, reticulate vitreous carbon, carbon foam, and graphite brush electrodes (Aelterman et al, 2006;Chaudhuri and Lovley, 2003;He et al, 2005;Logan et al, 2007;Zuo et al, 2007). The benefits of three dimensional (3D) anodes, which provide increased surface area for microbial attachment (Aelterman et al, 2008;Logan et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2011), have been demonstrated by comparing a packed bed of irregular graphite granules with three different thicknesses to a one-dimensional configuration (Di Lorenzo et al, 2010). Also, higher power outputs were observed in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) that have a 3D anode architecture (Chen et al, in press;Kim et al, 2011;Logan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several anode materials have been recently tested in MECs, including graphite granules, reticulate vitreous carbon, carbon foam, and graphite brush electrodes (Aelterman et al, 2006;Chaudhuri and Lovley, 2003;He et al, 2005;Logan et al, 2007;Zuo et al, 2007). The benefits of three dimensional (3D) anodes, which provide increased surface area for microbial attachment (Aelterman et al, 2008;Logan et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2011), have been demonstrated by comparing a packed bed of irregular graphite granules with three different thicknesses to a one-dimensional configuration (Di Lorenzo et al, 2010). Also, higher power outputs were observed in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) that have a 3D anode architecture (Chen et al, in press;Kim et al, 2011;Logan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher OLR translates into a higher availability of feedstock to be oxidized in the anode, which favors the metabolic activity of the electroactive biofilm and explains the enhanced power generation. On the contrary, an increased OLR has been related to lower efficiency for electron transfer processes from anode to cathode, hindering the adequate performance in an MFC [97].…”
Section: Effect Of Organic Loading Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the waste removal, operating at optimum OLR or sludge loading rate (SLR) is critical for an effective performance of MFCs, since both power density and current efficiency depend on the substrate conversion rate directly related to OLR [63,71,[94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103]. Thus, the energy generation is generally boosted by increasing the OLR up to a maximum, from which higher loading rates decrease the power output of the MFC.…”
Section: Effect Of Organic Loading Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface area of the anode plays a contributive role in power generation in MFC. A three dimensional anode would prove to be more effective toward electricity generation as it would provide more surface area for attachment of microbes (Di Lorenzo et al 2010). The current conductivity of the different materials which can be used for anode was studied and reported in the order of carbon felt > carbon foam > graphite (Chaudhuri & Lovely 2003).…”
Section: Anode Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small size of individual graphite brushes and their low resistance enables them to be a prime candidate for their utilization in MFC for various applications ). Di Lorenzo et al (2010) constructed a single-chamber MFC using packed bed of graphite granules as the anode. The current output was measured and found out to be increasing with increasing levels of anode thickness and the overall surface area.…”
Section: Anode Performancementioning
confidence: 99%