2006
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2005.069617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Increased Social Unacceptability of Cigarette Smoking on Reduction in Cigarette Consumption

Abstract: Taxes on cigarettes have long been used to help reduce cigarette consumption. Social factors also affect cigarette consumption, but this impact has not been quantified. We computed a social unacceptability index based on individuals’ responses to questions regarding locations where smoking should be allowed. A regression analysis showed that the social unacceptability index and price had similar elasticities and that their effects were independent of each other. If, through an active tobacco control campaign,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
126
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
126
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a likely explanation is that states that already have higher support are more likely to implement smoke-free laws. 19 Also, increases in support for smoke-free laws and the implementation of smoke-free laws may both be the reflection of a process of denormalization of smoking 3,5,6,20 that may be more present in some states than in others. It seems reasonable to think that there is not a single explanation for the larger increase in support in states that implemented a smoke-free law than in states that did not, but that a combination of the above described explanations is true.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, a likely explanation is that states that already have higher support are more likely to implement smoke-free laws. 19 Also, increases in support for smoke-free laws and the implementation of smoke-free laws may both be the reflection of a process of denormalization of smoking 3,5,6,20 that may be more present in some states than in others. It seems reasonable to think that there is not a single explanation for the larger increase in support in states that implemented a smoke-free law than in states that did not, but that a combination of the above described explanations is true.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,5,6 Monitoring population support for smoke-free laws is important to inform policy development, media advocacy and enforcement activities. 3 Another important reason for monitoring population support for smoke-free laws is the tobacco industry's claims that smoke-free laws are not supported by the public, that getting the public to comply with the laws will be difficult, and that there will be negative economic consequences of smoke-free laws for the hospitality industry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in the social unacceptability of smoking has had a dramatic impact on tobacco use in the US (Alamar and Glantz 2006) especially, in states and cities that have enacted tough tobacco control policies (Gilpin, Lee and Pierce 2004;Frieden et al 2005). However, how policies (e.g., smoke free air laws) and social factors (e.g., social norms) drive the social unacceptability of tobacco use are not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decline in the social acceptability of tobacco use in the United States over the past half-century is associated with a decrease in tobacco use ( Alamar & Glantz, 2006 ). A concern is that smokers who perceive that their smoking is unacceptable…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%