2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of incidence angle on the seismic performance of skewed bridges retrofitted with buckling-restrained braces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transverse connecting system of the main arch is a vulnerable component; because of the high level of stiffness of the lateral connection system, there a large internal force response and buckling instability occur under earthquake conditions [28,29]. Of the existing seismic performance-improvement technologies, buckling-restrained brace (BRB) may be the only type that can effectively address the buckling instability of the transverse connection system of the main arch [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. However, compared with buildings, the super-long-span CFST arch bridge has the characteristics of large internal force and small displacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transverse connecting system of the main arch is a vulnerable component; because of the high level of stiffness of the lateral connection system, there a large internal force response and buckling instability occur under earthquake conditions [28,29]. Of the existing seismic performance-improvement technologies, buckling-restrained brace (BRB) may be the only type that can effectively address the buckling instability of the transverse connection system of the main arch [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. However, compared with buildings, the super-long-span CFST arch bridge has the characteristics of large internal force and small displacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, earthquake motions exist not only 2-direction but also in 3-direction directions when determining earthquake behaviour in various engineering structures in many papers [16,17]. A range of construction types are evaluated asymmetric-plan structures [18], a high-rise steel building [19], RCC (Reinforced Cement Concrete) frames [20], a highway tunnel [21], tuned liquid column dampers [22], RC bridge [23], skewed bridges retrofitted with buckling-restrained braces [24], masonry building [25], RC building [26], hybrid reinforced concrete-steel building [27], and these are analysed and designed with regard to different seismic excitation angles. When the results of these studies were examined, it was observed that the maximum earthquake forces acting on a structure can occur at different angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the study did not considere the effect of the non-uniform excitations [14]. Wang et al (2020) investigated the effects of directionality of seismic waves on the fragility of a skewed reinforced concrete bridge. They found that the responses of the bridge are not sensitive to the directionality of the input wave, and the maximum responses can be evaluated by the responses in longitudianl and transverse directions [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2020) investigated the effects of directionality of seismic waves on the fragility of a skewed reinforced concrete bridge. They found that the responses of the bridge are not sensitive to the directionality of the input wave, and the maximum responses can be evaluated by the responses in longitudianl and transverse directions [15]. Feng et al (2020) developed a method to evaluate the maximum response of a curved bridge for the different seismic incidents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%