Effect of Implant Thread Geometry on Secondary Stability, Bone Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact

Trisi, Paolo; Berardini, Marco; Falco, Alessandra; Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri

doi:10.1097/id.0000000000000269

Cited by 43 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Vascular interruption, caused by drilling and cutting the bone, leads to necrosis of the osteocytes and thus to bone devitalization [44]. Also a temperature increase in bone over 10°C leads to death of osteocytes and to bone necrosis; thus, precise knowledge concerning the heat generation induced by laser, piezosurgery device, and a saw seems to be key factor of therapeutic success after ridge splitting procedure.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Temperature Rise and Time of Alveolar Ridge Splitting by Means of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Surgical Saw: An Ex Vivo Study

Matys¹,

Flieger²,

Dominiak

2016

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The most common adverse effect after bone cutting is a thermal damage. The aim of our study was to evaluate the bone temperature rise during an alveolar ridge splitting, rating the time needed to perform this procedure and the time to raise the temperature of a bone by 10°C, as well as to evaluate the bone carbonization occurrence. The research included 60 mandibles (n = 60) of adult pigs, divided into 4 groups (n = 15). Two vertical and one horizontal cut have been done in an alveolar ridge using Er:YAG laser with set power of 200 mJ (G1), 400 mJ (G2), piezosurgery unit (G3), and a saw (G4). The temperature was measured by K-type thermocouple. The highest temperature gradient was noted for piezosurgery on the buccal and lingual side of mandible. The temperature rises on the bone surface along with the increase of laser power. The lower time needed to perform ridge splitting was measured for a saw, piezosurgery, and Er:YAG laser with power of 400 mJ and 200 mJ, respectively. The temperature rise measured on the bone over 10°C and bone carbonization occurrence was not reported in all study groups. Piezosurgery, Er:YAG laser (200 mJ and 400 mJ), and surgical saw are useful and safe tools in ridge splitting surgery.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Temperature Rise and Time of Alveolar Ridge Splitting by Means of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Surgical Saw: An Ex Vivo Study

Matys¹,

Flieger²,

Dominiak

2016

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…8,9 Trisi et al 10 evaluated the effect of 2 different thread designs on secondary stability (micromotion) and osseointegration rate in dense and cancellous bones. 8,9 Trisi et al 10 evaluated the effect of 2 different thread designs on secondary stability (micromotion) and osseointegration rate in dense and cancellous bones.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling the effect of osseointegration on dental implant pullout and torque removal tests

Rittel

Dorogoy

Shemtov‐Yona

2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…24 Çalışmalarda konik ve agresif özellikli yivlere sahip implantların düşük kemik yoğunluğunda ve miktarında, silindir ve silik yivlere sahip implantlara göre yerleştirme torklarının daha yüksek olduğu belirtilmektedir. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Yerleştirilen implantın iyileşme süresince stabilizasyonunun korunması, osseointegrasyonun sağlanması ve yükleme sonrasında korunmasında en önemli başarı faktörü olarak görülmektedir. 32 İmplant sağkalım oranı bakımından gruplar arasında fark görülmemesinin diğer bir nedeni olarak da hasta seçim kriterleri gösterilebilir.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Evaluation of survival of implants placed simultaneously with sinus floor elevation operation at different residual bone height

Bedeloğlu¹,

Gültekin²

2018

Yeditepe J Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZET Amaç: Dişlerin kaybedilmesi sonrası alveolar kemikte rezorpsiyon meydana gelmektedir. Posterior maksillada yetersiz kemik yüksekliği durumunda, implant yerleştirilmesi için sinüs tabanı operasyonu uzun yıllardır başarılı bir şekilde uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı posterior maksillada sinüs tabanı altında kemik yüksekliğinin implant yerleştirilmesi için yetersiz olduğu durumlarda, sinüs tabanı yükseltme operasyonu ile eşzamanlı yerleştirilen implantların başarısını değer-lendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif planlanan çalışmaya sistemik olarak sağlıklı ve posterior maksillada dental implant ihtiyacı olan hastalar dahil edilmiştir. Hastalar dental volumetrik tomografi kullanılarak sinüs tabanı altında mevcut kemik yük-sekliği ölçülerek ≥5 mm (Kontrol grubu) ve < 5 mm (Test grubu) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Yerleştirilen implantların takip süresince sağkalım oranları değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmada toplam 31 hastaya yerleştirilen 62 implant (Kontrol: 35, Test: 27) değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmaya dahil edilen her iki grup kıyaslandığında sağkalım oranları açısın-dan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olmadığı gözlemlenmiş-tir. Sonuçlar: Çalışmada rezidüel kemik yüksekliğinin, sinüs tabanı yükseltme operasyonu ile aynı seansta yerleştirilen dental implantların sağkalımını etkilemediği sonucuna varılmıştır.Anahtar kelimeler: Dental implant, sağkalım oranı, tek aşama sinüs tabanı yükseltme SUMMARY Aim: Resorption occurs after teeth loss in alveolar ridge. In case of insufficient bone height in posterior maxilla, sinus floor operation for implant placement has been successfully applied for many years. The purpose of this study is to assess the success of implants placed simultaneously with sinus floor elevation operation, in cases where bone height under the sinus floor in the posterior maxilla is insufficient for implant placement. Materials and Methods:In this retrospective study design, patients who were systemically healthy and required dental implant in posterior maxilla were included. Patients were divided into two groups; ≥5 mm (control group) and <5 mm (test group) by measuring the bone height under sinus floor using dental volumetric tomography. Survival rates of implants were evaluated during follow-up. Results: In this study, 62 implants placed in 31 patients (Control: 35, Test: 27) were evaluated. When the two groups included in the study were compared, it was observed that there was no statistically significant difference in survival rates. Conclusions:The study concluded that the residual bone height did not affect the survival rate of dental implants placed simultaneously with the sinus floor elevation operation. Keywords: Dental implant, survival rate, one stage sinus floor elevation ÖZGÜN ARAŞTIRMA 62 7tepeklinik GİRİŞ Modern diş hekimliğinde diş eksikliğinin rehabilitasyonunda dental implantlar en çok kullanılan yöntemlerden biridir. Dental implantların yerleştirilebilmesi için yeterli hacimde kemik dokusuna ihtiyaç vardır. Konvansiyonel tedavi protokolünde denta...

show abstract

Effect of Implant Thread Geometry on Secondary Stability, Bone Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact

Cited by 43 publications

References 25 publications

Assessment of Temperature Rise and Time of Alveolar Ridge Splitting by Means of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Surgical Saw: An Ex Vivo Study

Assessment of Temperature Rise and Time of Alveolar Ridge Splitting by Means of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Surgical Saw: An Ex Vivo Study

Modeling the effect of osseointegration on dental implant pullout and torque removal tests

Evaluation of survival of implants placed simultaneously with sinus floor elevation operation at different residual bone height

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About