1970
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-133-34547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Immunosuppressive Agents on Retention of Antigen in the Mouse Spleen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He responded well to local and systemic steroid treatment. That steroids may have actually promoted clearance of antigen is supported by the work of Netterheim and Hamous 14 who showed that corticosteroids given in vivo reduced the retention of antigen in germinal centers in lymph nodes, possibly by an effect on the surface of dentritic macrophages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…He responded well to local and systemic steroid treatment. That steroids may have actually promoted clearance of antigen is supported by the work of Netterheim and Hamous 14 who showed that corticosteroids given in vivo reduced the retention of antigen in germinal centers in lymph nodes, possibly by an effect on the surface of dentritic macrophages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For example, Unanue (1972) indicated that antigen-binding dendritic cells were highly radiosensitive, a conclusion drawn from experiments which showed that irradiation could prevent antigen trapping (Williams 1966, Hanna & Hunter (1971. X-irradiation was also moderately effective in eliciting the removal of aggregated gamma globulin and other protein antigens from lymphoid follicles (Nettesheim & Hammons 1970, Jaroslow & Nossal 1966. By contrast, Schwartz et al (1978) showed that in the mouse, la*, lgT hy r adherent cells from the spleen, which were necessary for antigen presentation to syngeneic lymphoid ceils in vitro, were resistant to 900 rads.…”
Section: Antigen Localization In Immune Suppressed Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may result from the abolishment or elimination of a major portion of the immunocompetent T and/or B proliferative cells (Turk & Poulter 1972). In addition, the treatments may decrease or abolish the antigen processing ability of macrophages (Nettesheim & Hammons 1970). The appearance of a developing IgE and IgG antibody response in treated Hooded Lister rats between day 26 and 33, i.e., prior to booster immunization, seems to indicate that 'unprocessed' antigen, either retained within the immune system, possibly attached to antigen receptors on B cells, or remaining in the immunization depot, may stimulate subsequent generations of immunocompetent cells.…”
Section: Ige and Igg Antibody Responses In Rats Treated With Immunosumentioning
confidence: 99%