2017
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of N‐acetylcysteine on pain in daily life in patients with sickle cell disease: a randomised clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the recent study of Sins et al. ( 55 ) failed to clearly detect any clinical impact of NAC treatment in SCA. One possible explanation of this disappointing result could be that adherence to NAC treatment was very low in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the recent study of Sins et al. ( 55 ) failed to clearly detect any clinical impact of NAC treatment in SCA. One possible explanation of this disappointing result could be that adherence to NAC treatment was very low in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Interestingly, the findings of Sins et al. showed that rates of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) were decreased in adherent patients ( 55 ). NAC is a precursor of reduced glutathione (GSH), an endogenous antioxidant, and GSH has been shown to be reduced in RBCs of SCA patients ( 57 , 58 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an open-label pilot trial of oral N-acetylcysteine (NAC), treatment with either 1,200 mg or 2,400 mg daily for 6 weeks increased whole blood glutathione levels and decreased erythrocyte outer membrane phosphatidylserine exposure, plasma levels of advanced glycation products, and cell-free hemoglobin in both groups 91 . A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of NAC at 600 mg twice daily for 6 months did not decrease the rate of SCD-related pain days per patient year, vaso-occlusive crises, hospital admission days, number of admissions, or days with home analgesic use compared with placebo 92 . The safety and efficacy of NAC, administered at a higher dose during pain crisis, is being explored in a phase I/II study (NCT01800526) ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Drug Therapies For Sickle Cell Diseasementioning
confidence: 86%
“…No patients experienced painful crises or other significant SCD-or NAC-related complications during the trial. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, treatment with NAC at a dose of 600 mg twice daily for 6 months did not decrease the rate of SCD-related pain days per patient year compared with placebo [96]. In addition, there were no differences in the days with vaso-occlusive crises, admission days, number of admissions or days with home analgesic use.…”
Section: Anti-oxidant Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%