2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra27523g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of hydrogen ion implantation on cholesterol sensing using enzyme-free LAPONITE®-montmorillonite electrodes

Abstract: Electrochemical profiling of LAPONITE®-montmorillonite/indium tin oxide (L-MMT/ITO) electrodes irradiated with 20 keV H2+ ion beam with variable fluence ranging from 1012 to 1016 ions per cm2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EIS is an important technique which provides information about the resistance within the electrode material and also the resistance between the electrolyte and the electrode. 41 42,43 After immobilization of antigens over the irradiated electrodes [CagA antigen@ZnO-T/SP-AuE (ϕ = 10 15 ) and CagA antigen@ ZnO-T/SP-AuE (ϕ = 10 16 )] having large diameter showed greater hindrance to electron transfer as compared to the small semicircle of ZnO-T modified SP-electrodes (irradiated). Both CV and EIS are consistent in showing the modification of the electrode by ion irradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EIS is an important technique which provides information about the resistance within the electrode material and also the resistance between the electrolyte and the electrode. 41 42,43 After immobilization of antigens over the irradiated electrodes [CagA antigen@ZnO-T/SP-AuE (ϕ = 10 15 ) and CagA antigen@ ZnO-T/SP-AuE (ϕ = 10 16 )] having large diameter showed greater hindrance to electron transfer as compared to the small semicircle of ZnO-T modified SP-electrodes (irradiated). Both CV and EIS are consistent in showing the modification of the electrode by ion irradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, after ion beam irradiation with different fluences of N 2 + ions (1 × 10 15 and 1 × 10 16 ) Ret gradually decreases having the lowest Ret of 160 Ω, recorded for ZnO-T/SP-AuE (ϕ = 10 15 ). The modified electrode irradiation with ϕ = 10 15 (low fluence) results in improved charge transfer owing to breakage of H-bonds resulting in creation of active sites enhancing diffusion of Ferricyanide and Ferrocyanide ions toward the surface of modified electrode. , After immobilization of antigens over the irradiated electrodes [CagA antigen@ZnO-T/SP-AuE (ϕ = 10 15 ) and CagA antigen@ZnO-T/SP-AuE (ϕ = 10 16 )] having large diameter showed greater hindrance to electron transfer as compared to the small semicircle of ZnO-T modified SP-electrodes (irradiated). Both CV and EIS are consistent in showing the modification of the electrode by ion irradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Already published results for non-enzymatic Chol sensors have been quite varied; for instance, Tong et al reported a low linear range of 10-300 nM with an LOD of 1 nM using MWCNT and a molecularly imprinted polymer [40]. Yoshi and coworkers reported a higher linearity range of 1-20 mM (that is, within the range of cholesterol found in blood of 1.81-4.9 mmol/L) but a low sensitivity (8.08 µA mM −1 cm −2 ) using Laponite-Montmorillonite material [41]. As for copper oxide materials, Khaliq et al recently reported Cu 2 O NP/TiO 2 nanotubes with a linear range of 24.4-622 µM, 0.05 µM of LOD, and 6034.04 µA mM −1 cm −2 sensitivity [18].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Cu/cu 2 O As Cholesterol Electrochemical Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joshi et al studied the effect of hydrogen ion implantation on the synthetic nanoclay electrode for non-enzymatic sensing of cholesterol. The developed LAPONITE ® -montmorillonite/indium tin oxide (L-MMT/ITO) film displays about a 20% increase in sensitivity for cholesterol detection at the ion fluence of ~1013 ions per cm 2 [ 48 ]. The performance of the sensor is illustrated by schematic as shown in Figure 5 .…”
Section: Nanomaterials For Non-enzymatic Cholesterol Biosensormentioning
confidence: 99%