2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of hydraulic retention time on microbial community in biochemical passive reactors during treatment of acid mine drainage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the treatment does not only depend on the geometric parameters of the reactor, it is also affected by factors such as HRT and COD as well as the typology of the microbial community (Cunha et al, 2019; Lu et al, 2016; Vasquez et al, 2018). Among the microbial properties, the exogenous and/or acidophilic nature of the biological strain seems to influence the efficiency of the process.…”
Section: The Use Of Microbial Sulfate Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficiency of the treatment does not only depend on the geometric parameters of the reactor, it is also affected by factors such as HRT and COD as well as the typology of the microbial community (Cunha et al, 2019; Lu et al, 2016; Vasquez et al, 2018). Among the microbial properties, the exogenous and/or acidophilic nature of the biological strain seems to influence the efficiency of the process.…”
Section: The Use Of Microbial Sulfate Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the scale of one study, factors such as the COD/SO 4 ratio and HRT may have important effects on removal yields. Concerning the HRT parameter, Vasquez et al (2018) suggested that long HRTs tend to favour the abundance of SRB while short durations rather promote other communities (acidophilic and chemo-lithotrophic). However, as mentioned above, our review showed that high removal can be achieved independently from HRT magnitude (Cf.…”
Section: The Use Of Microbial Sulfate Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, en biorreactores empacados con mezclas reactivas se ha evidenciado mayor diversidad de bacterias celulolíticas y fermentativas, capaces de degradar la materia orgánica con capacidad para donar electrones y afectar la cinética de formación de sulfuros metálicos, mientras que las BSR se encuentran en baja proporción (5 -10 %) (Hiibel et al, 2008;Rezadehbashi y Baldwin, 2018). Se ha establecido que la comunidad microbiana en los reactores pasivos está relacionada con factores como el inóculo (Pereyra et al, 2010), los substratos orgánicos (Song et al, 2012a;Song et al, 2012b;Lefticariu et al, 2015), el tiempo de operación (Aoyagi et al, 2018), pH (Aoyagi et al, 2017;Fan et al, 2019) y el tiempo de retención hidráulica (Aoyagi et al, 2017;Vásquez et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Comunidades Microbianas Encontradas En Rbpunclassified
“…La cuantificación de los genes funcionales dsrA, cel48 y hydA por qPCR ha permitido el estudio de su dinámica bajo la influencia de diferentes factores que determinan la eficiencia de los RBP. En previos estudios con estos genes se ha demostrado cómo la composición de los substratos orgánicos (Hiibel et al, 2011), el efecto de la bioaumentación y bioestimulación (Pereyra et al, 2012), las condiciones medio ambientales y de operación (Vásquez et al, 2018) de los biorreactores pueden incrementar las comunidades microbianas, y por lo tanto el éxito para la remoción de sulfatos y metales.…”
Section: Comunidades Microbianas Encontradas En Rbpunclassified
“…Current research on passive bioreactors has focused on the study of the microbial communities involved [22,23]. Environmental factors (HRT, organic source, pH, metals, sulfates, and sulfides) have a significant impact on the composition of microbial communities, and the study of reactor microorganisms is critical for the selection of phylogenetic groups as inoculum [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%