2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Hurricane Katrina on Chronobiology at Onset of Acute Myocardial Infarction During the Subsequent Three Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected trends in circadian variation of AMI onset were also altered in the post-Katrina period. 25 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected trends in circadian variation of AMI onset were also altered in the post-Katrina period. 25 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Furthermore, after Hurricane Katrina, the increase in the percentage of admissions for AMI was accompanied by an alteration in the traditional chronobiological pattern of onset of AMI, suggesting possible changes in factors triggering the acute event. 6 Because neither the occurrence nor the chronobiology of AMI presented any sign of returning to pre-Katrina levels in the first 3 years after the storm, the long-lasting effect of Hurricane Katrina is yet to be established. Consequently, the present study was designed to provide a long-term follow-up (4-6 years) on the effects of Hurricane Katrina on the pattern of AMI in New Orleans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown an increase in AMI during the immediate hours to weeks following natural disasters45. However, most studies have been conducted on the long-term effects of extreme weather events, such as Hurricane Katrina, which have been shown to be associated with an increased incidence of ACS occurring for up to six years after the hurricane134647. A single-center study found a 3-fold increase in the proportion of admissions for AMI in the 2 years following Katrina (2.18% vs. 0.71%, p < 0.0001), and also noted that the post-Katrina group had higher rates of unemployment, lack of insurance, medication non-compliance, smoking, and substance abuse13.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%