2014
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2012.761594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Hurdle Technology in Food Preservation: A Review

Abstract: Hurdle technology is used in industrialized as well as in developing countries for the gentle but effective preservation of foods. Hurdle technology was developed several years ago as a new concept for the production of safe, stable, nutritious, tasty, and economical foods. Previously hurdle technology, i.e., a combination of preservation methods, was used empirically without much knowledge of the governing principles. The intelligent application of hurdle technology has become more prevalent now, because the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the characteristics and storage condition of PSDW products, such as natural spices and packaging, could inhibit the growth of these initial bacteria, but was not capable of controlling Weisella spp., S. equorum and S. parauberis during storage. Therefore, other technologies will be applied to this product to control these microorganisms (Singh and Shalini 2016). The bacteria in group 2 and group 4 at the end of storage were fewer and simpler, which was consistent with the results of the total viable counts.…”
Section: Dgge Analysis Of V3 Regionssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the characteristics and storage condition of PSDW products, such as natural spices and packaging, could inhibit the growth of these initial bacteria, but was not capable of controlling Weisella spp., S. equorum and S. parauberis during storage. Therefore, other technologies will be applied to this product to control these microorganisms (Singh and Shalini 2016). The bacteria in group 2 and group 4 at the end of storage were fewer and simpler, which was consistent with the results of the total viable counts.…”
Section: Dgge Analysis Of V3 Regionssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…equorum and S. parauberis during storage. Therefore, other technologies will be applied to this product to control these micro‐organisms (Singh and Shalini ). The bacteria in group 2 and group 4 at the end of storage were fewer and simpler, which was consistent with the results of the total viable counts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, risk mitigation and preservation options are needed to prolong shelf lives and to improve food safety for the following food groups; (i) minimally processed, convenient foods, (ii) chilled foods with “invisible technology”, (iii) healthful foods with less salt and/or fat, (iv) less packaged foods. To achieve these aims Singh and Shalini (2016) suggested combining hurdle technologies with predictive microbiology models) and HACCP to achieve food safety and longer shelf lives (Singh and Shalini, 2016). …”
Section: Potential Hurdlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fermentation processes involve substantial modifications in the food matrix that increase its nutritional value [9,10] and also provide unique organoleptic attributes [11] and useful technological properties [12]. When fermented foods are not subjected to further technological transformations, such as pasteurization or high pressure treatments [13,14], they can be used as vehicle for probiotics: "live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host" [15]. Although recent findings suggest that bacteria viability is not always necessary for producing beneficial clinical effects [16][17][18], major efforts have been directed towards maintaining the highest load of alive microorganisms at the time of consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%