2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-2194(03)00171-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of host plant resistance in some cowpea (Vigna unguiculata {L.} Walp.) cultivars on growth and developmental parameters of the flower bud thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti (Trybom)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was perhaps to be expected, as the level of resistance was assessed based on leaf injury (Maharijaya et al., ) and not on the duration of the developmental stages. Also in other studies, no effect of resistance on the duration of developmental stages of thrips was observed (Trichillo & Leigh, ; Soria & Mollema, ; Alabi et al., ; Maris et al., ). Obviously, a longer developmental period would further delay thrips population development from reaching the threshold level for economic damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This was perhaps to be expected, as the level of resistance was assessed based on leaf injury (Maharijaya et al., ) and not on the duration of the developmental stages. Also in other studies, no effect of resistance on the duration of developmental stages of thrips was observed (Trichillo & Leigh, ; Soria & Mollema, ; Alabi et al., ; Maris et al., ). Obviously, a longer developmental period would further delay thrips population development from reaching the threshold level for economic damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The range of thrips damages scores (1-7) recorded, indicated the possibility of obtaining sources of thrips resistance among the evaluated genotypes. The lowest damage scores were recorded on the cultivars IT2841*brown, MU20B, WC17, WC29, MU24C, and WC5 (most resistant cultivars); while the highest scores were recorded on WC36 (most susceptible) suggesting some factors conferring the resistance in these cultivars, since resistance to insects can be through their biology, physiology or even their behaviour (Alabi et al, 2004). In fact, cryptic behaviour of some cowpea lines possessing leafy floral structures and growing vigorously could favour gathering of thrips population (Alabi et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The trends in thrips damages over time, per location, showed a lower peak on resistant cultivars than on the susceptible check; suggesting the involvement of antibiosis or non-preference as resistance mechanism to thrips in these varieties. Antibiosis and non-preference have been reported in cowpea resistance to flower thrips by Alabi et al (2004) in Nigeria under laboratory conditions. Further assessment of the biochemical constituents in these resistant and susceptible cowpea cultivars as regards to M. sjostedt, could reveal additional cues of resistance mechanism of cowpea to thrips.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results also showed that a monocrop of French bean favoured the highest population of M. sjostedti compared to when French bean was intercropped with baby corn, Irish potato, or sunflower. Megalurothrips sjostedti also dominated in the field in the two seasons: the thrips species is native to Africa and is widespread indeed (Nabirye et al., 2003; Alabi et al., 2004; Ngakou et al., 2008). In addition, natural enemies such as Orius albidipennis Reuter play an important role in regulating M. sjostedti population (Gitonga et al., 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sjostedti , F. occidentalis , F. schultzei , and Hydatothrips aldolfifriderici (Karny) (Nyasani et al., 2010). Megalurothrips sjostedti is a common and widespread pest in Africa (Karungi et al., 2000; Alabi et al., 2004; Ngakou et al., 2008). Megalurothrips sjostedti and H. aldolfifriderici feed mainly on legumes, particularly beans, cowpeas, and soya bean (Nabirye et al., 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%