2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of homophily on network formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We incorporate homophily in this way because its influence on an incoming node's linking choices remains constant. Some authors incorporate homophily as a weighting of the degree of a node, and find, similar to our results here, that homophily "makes the rich even richer"[Kim and Altmann, 2017] and that homophily can lead to minority group members occupying less important places in the network[Karimi et al, 2018].8 One might also think that winning a credit attribution contest would make an existing node more "prestigious" and thus would increase its value in the eyes of incoming nodes. This is not included in the model, but would likely intensify the effects reported here.9 This HEG advantage exists in a model where information spreads by diffusion as well, in a simple contagion model where each discoverer tells their neighbors, who tell their neighbors that have not already heard of the discovery, and so on (with people receiving conflicting information choosing to assign credit randomly).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…We incorporate homophily in this way because its influence on an incoming node's linking choices remains constant. Some authors incorporate homophily as a weighting of the degree of a node, and find, similar to our results here, that homophily "makes the rich even richer"[Kim and Altmann, 2017] and that homophily can lead to minority group members occupying less important places in the network[Karimi et al, 2018].8 One might also think that winning a credit attribution contest would make an existing node more "prestigious" and thus would increase its value in the eyes of incoming nodes. This is not included in the model, but would likely intensify the effects reported here.9 This HEG advantage exists in a model where information spreads by diffusion as well, in a simple contagion model where each discoverer tells their neighbors, who tell their neighbors that have not already heard of the discovery, and so on (with people receiving conflicting information choosing to assign credit randomly).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…From characteristics of real-world datasets [22] and empirical results of the state-of-the-art [17,24,49], we argue that a high-quality network alignment solution should respect: (R1) Consistency: Structural consistency and attribute consistency shall be respected since these constraints help to find true anchor links [17,49]. False positives could hamper downstream applications, such as personalized advertisement and friend suggestion.…”
Section: A Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing the problem formulated above is indeed a challenging task. The alignment model should consider the structure and attribute consistencies in an efficient manner, as these are essential guidelines for a high-quality alignment solution [35]. The alignment model should also be aware of structure and feature consistency violations (noise).…”
Section: Framework Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%