1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00149.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of high pressure on the reduction of microbial populations in vegetables

Abstract: Resistance of micro‐organisms to high pressure is variable and directly related to extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Pressures of 100, 200, 300, 350 and 400 MPa were applied at 20°C for 10 min and at 10°C for 20 min using strains of Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria, moulds and yeasts, as well as spores of Gram‐positive bacteria. The results showed that at pressures of 100 and 200 MPa, decreases in microbial populations were not significant, whereas the populations of all the micro‐organisms tested decre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
65
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…through activation of the spore's nutrient receptors (Shigeta et al 2007). In addition to these spoilage microorganisms, E. coli O157 (Gill and Ramaswamy 2008), Salmonella typhimurium (Arroyo et al 1997), L. monocytogenes (Préstamo et al 1999), and Aeromonas hydrophila (Durães-Carvalho et al 2012) were completely inactivated by HP of 350-600 MPa for 3-10 min at room temperature, although the occurrence of pressure-resistant strains has been reported in E. coli O157:H7 (Jordan et al 2001) and L. monocytogenes (Van Boeijen et al 2008).…”
Section: In Vitro Study On Microorganisms Associated With Fresh-cut Pmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…through activation of the spore's nutrient receptors (Shigeta et al 2007). In addition to these spoilage microorganisms, E. coli O157 (Gill and Ramaswamy 2008), Salmonella typhimurium (Arroyo et al 1997), L. monocytogenes (Préstamo et al 1999), and Aeromonas hydrophila (Durães-Carvalho et al 2012) were completely inactivated by HP of 350-600 MPa for 3-10 min at room temperature, although the occurrence of pressure-resistant strains has been reported in E. coli O157:H7 (Jordan et al 2001) and L. monocytogenes (Van Boeijen et al 2008).…”
Section: In Vitro Study On Microorganisms Associated With Fresh-cut Pmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The HP treatment also eliminated Escherichia coli (Dogan and Erkmen 2003;Muñoz et al 2007;Lavinas et al 2008), E. coli O157 (Jordan et al 2001;Whitney et al 2008), and Listeria monocytogenes (Jordan et al 2001) inoculated into the fruit juices. However, there are few studies on successful application of HP to fresh vegetables (Arroyo et al 1997;, and little information exists on the effect of HP on the microbiological safety and shelf life of fresh-cut produce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jest ona zwykle bardziej odporna na działanie wysokich ciśnień niż sztucznie wprowadzone drobnoustroje [2,30]. Na przykład ciśnienie 350 MPa (20 °C, 10 min) zmniejszyło populację 10 4 komórek/ml drożdży i pleśni naturalnie występujących w pomidorach i sałacie o 3 rzędy wielkości, podczas gdy w tych samych warunkach całkowitej inaktywacji uległy wprowadzone w tej samej liczbie Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Aspergillus niger i Penicillum spp.…”
Section: Przeżywalność Mikroorganizmów W Warzywach I Owocach Oraz Ichunclassified
“…Na przykład ciśnienie 350 MPa (20 °C, 10 min) zmniejszyło populację 10 4 komórek/ml drożdży i pleśni naturalnie występujących w pomidorach i sałacie o 3 rzędy wielkości, podczas gdy w tych samych warunkach całkowitej inaktywacji uległy wprowadzone w tej samej liczbie Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Aspergillus niger i Penicillum spp. [2].Metoda z wykorzystaniem wysokiego ciśnienia może być dobrym sposobem utrwalania kwaśnych produktów owocowych takich, jak: soki owocowe, dżemy, galaretki [10,17]. Podstawową mikroflorę tych produktów stanowią drożdże, pleśnie i bakterie kwasu mlekowego, a więc organizmy stosunkowo wrażliwe na działanie ciśnienia [1,35].…”
unclassified
“…The most efficient methods of inactivation are gamma irradiation and thermal inactivation as well as chemical sterilization methods such as the peracetic acid-ethanol treatment of bone (49). The direct effect of HHP to achieve killing of vegetative bacterial, yeast and mould cells, has been documented as well (50,51), although much higher pressure values of 500 -700 MPa are needed than for the inactivation of viruses (52,53). Interestingly, Gram-positive bacteria are more resistant to HHP than Gram-negative bacteria (54).…”
Section: Effect Of Hhp-treatment On Viability Of Microorganisms In Bonementioning
confidence: 99%