1983
DOI: 10.3109/01674828309088321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of high-dose progesterone on the pre-menstrual syndrome; a double-blind cross-over trial

Abstract: ReferencesI PERSKY M, O'BRIAN CP, KHAN MA: Reproductive hormone levels, sexual activity and moods during the menstrual cycle. Psychosom Med 38:62, 1976 z ABPLANALP JM, DONELLY AF, ROSE RM: Psychoendocrinology of the menstrual cycle. Psychmom Med 41587, I979 Mood and the menstrual cycle. Unpublished manuscript, 1981 4 DENNERSEIN L, ABRAHAM SF: Affective changes and the menstrual cycle. In: Handbook ofpsychiaw and endocrinology, PJV Beumont and GD Burrows (eds). Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp 367-400, 1982 Sexual arous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows the individual standardised mean difference for each trial, the type of preparation and dosage for that trial, and the pooled standardised mean difference with 95% confidence intervals for trials that used progesterone suppositories and those that used oral micronised progesterone. The inclusion of the data from the two low quality trials 25 26 did not significantly affect the overall result.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 shows the individual standardised mean difference for each trial, the type of preparation and dosage for that trial, and the pooled standardised mean difference with 95% confidence intervals for trials that used progesterone suppositories and those that used oral micronised progesterone. The inclusion of the data from the two low quality trials 25 26 did not significantly affect the overall result.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On our quality score four of the 10 progesterone trials 20 22 23 28 and two of the three progestogen trials 30 31 scored 6, five progesterone trials 16 – 18 21 25 and the other progestogen trial32 scored 7, and one trial of progesterone scored the maximum of 8 9…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In seven studies there was no attempt to measure different types of premenstrual symptom, to allow assessment of differential treatment effects. Twelve studies used a double blind cross-over design, but in only five was the design, according to the description, methodologically adequate (Abraham & Hargrove, 1980;Andersen e l al., 1977;Mattson & von Schoultz, 1974;Sampson, 1979;Van der Meer et al, 1983) and only two studies were analysed for order or carry over effects (Abraham & Hargrove, 1980;Sampson. 1979).…”
Section: Placebo Response and The Interpretation Of Treatment Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trials have failed to support this (e.g. Jordheim, 1972;Williams et al, 1983;Dennerstein et al, 1986;Kerr et al, 1980;Sampson, 1979;van der Meer et al, 1983;Maddocks et al, 1986). The only exception is a study by Dennerstein et aL (1985) in which oral micronized progesterone was assessed and some beneficial effects were seen.…”
Section: Pms and Luteal Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 90%