2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heterogeneous aqueous reactions on the secondary formation of inorganic aerosols during haze events

Abstract: h i g h l i g h t sHeterogeneous aqueous reactions during haze events was investigated. The conversion of gas-phase of S and N to particle-phase was analyzed. Relationships were given between conversion ratio of S, N with RH and O 3 . Evolution of aerosol composition and particle size were analyzed. a b s t r a c tThe effect of heterogeneous aqueous reactions on the secondary formation of inorganic aerosols during haze events was investigated by analysis of comprehensive measurements of aerosol composition and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation is the enhanced formation of 25 secondary aerosol species during severe haze episodes that were associated with the oxidation of precursors (e.g., SO 2 and NO 2 ). This is particularly important for SO 2 that can be rapidly oxidized to form sulfate via aqueous-phase and/or fog processing (Sun et al, 2013c;Quan et al, 2015), while the role of NO 2 oxidation is generally small due to its much slower aqueous-phase processing rates (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006), which is also supported by the shorter lifetime of SO 2 compared with that of NO 2 in the atmosphere. In addition, the scavenging rates of gaseous species and particles can be substantially 30 different during the high RH event (Wayne et al, 1991;Dan et al, 1999;Dan et al, 2003;Mcmurry et al, 2004).…”
Section: Vertical Co-variations Of Pollutantsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…One explanation is the enhanced formation of 25 secondary aerosol species during severe haze episodes that were associated with the oxidation of precursors (e.g., SO 2 and NO 2 ). This is particularly important for SO 2 that can be rapidly oxidized to form sulfate via aqueous-phase and/or fog processing (Sun et al, 2013c;Quan et al, 2015), while the role of NO 2 oxidation is generally small due to its much slower aqueous-phase processing rates (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006), which is also supported by the shorter lifetime of SO 2 compared with that of NO 2 in the atmosphere. In addition, the scavenging rates of gaseous species and particles can be substantially 30 different during the high RH event (Wayne et al, 1991;Dan et al, 1999;Dan et al, 2003;Mcmurry et al, 2004).…”
Section: Vertical Co-variations Of Pollutantsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Hence, the acidity, hygroscopicity, and RH represent the key factors for sulfate formation on fine PM, explaining the differences in the various ambient measurements (14,(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). For example, the acidity effect on fine aerosols is effectively overcome by NH 3 neutralization in Xi'an and Beijing (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model simulation of dissolution of NO 2 in cloud droplets under NO x -rich environments has shown enhanced regional wintertime sulfate by up to 20%, resulting in better agreement between simulations and observations (13). Also, atmospheric measurements have revealed high sulfate production during severe haze events in China (21)(22)(23)(24)(25), which cannot be explained by current atmospheric models and suggests missing sulfur oxidation mechanisms (14). Typically, high sulfate levels during haze events in China occurred with concurrently elevated RH, NO x , and NH 3 (24,25), implicating an aqueous sulfur oxidation pathway.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3b and 3c for Case-2 verify this conclusion as well. Besides, an ambience with high relative humidity (RH) is favorable for the increase of PM2.5 concentration in the ABL through secondary formation by heterogeneous reactions (Quan et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2012;Faust et al, 2017) and hygroscopic growth (Engelhart et al, 2011;Petters and Kreidenweis, 2008). For Case-1, the RH during the CS keeps high with a mean value of 53% but sharply 25 falls into a very low level once entering the TS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%