1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01709552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of hemofiltration on hemodynamics and systemic concentrations of anaphylatoxins and cytokines in human sepsis

Abstract: HF effectively eliminated the anaphylatoxins C3adesArg and C5adesArg during sepsis. There was also a significant rise in SVR and MAP during high volume HF. Therefore, HF may represent a new modality for removal of anaphylatoxins and may, thereby, deserve clinical testing in patients with severe sepsis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A few papers reported on hybrid therapies such as combined plasma filtration adsorption, 32 adsorption combined with standard hemodiafiltration 14 and plasma filtration combined with standard hemodiafiltration. 47 Standard techniques include both hemofiltration using standard filters at standard doses 13,17,18,20,22,23,35,[39][40][41]43,49,51 as well as hemofiltration at high volume doses 19,49 according to current definitions; with the latter labeled as HVHF. Standard or high cut-off techniques included continuous hemofiltration, 13,[15][16][17][18]20,22,23,35,[39][40][41]43,49,51 continuous hemodialysis 15,18,27,45 and continuous hemodiafiltration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few papers reported on hybrid therapies such as combined plasma filtration adsorption, 32 adsorption combined with standard hemodiafiltration 14 and plasma filtration combined with standard hemodiafiltration. 47 Standard techniques include both hemofiltration using standard filters at standard doses 13,17,18,20,22,23,35,[39][40][41]43,49,51 as well as hemofiltration at high volume doses 19,49 according to current definitions; with the latter labeled as HVHF. Standard or high cut-off techniques included continuous hemofiltration, 13,[15][16][17][18]20,22,23,35,[39][40][41]43,49,51 continuous hemodialysis 15,18,27,45 and continuous hemodiafiltration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 Standard techniques include both hemofiltration using standard filters at standard doses 13,17,18,20,22,23,35,[39][40][41]43,49,51 as well as hemofiltration at high volume doses 19,49 according to current definitions; with the latter labeled as HVHF. Standard or high cut-off techniques included continuous hemofiltration, 13,[15][16][17][18]20,22,23,35,[39][40][41]43,49,51 continuous hemodialysis 15,18,27,45 and continuous hemodiafiltration. 21,[24][25][26]36 The main cytokines measured in the clinical studies were interleukin-1b (IL-1b), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) Other cytokines measured were interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R), interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) and soluble TNF-alpha receptors I and II (sTNFaRI and sTNFaRII).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that in the Rogiers study the body temperature fell below baseline with the lowest value of 36.1°C, which is in marked contrast to our results. Alternatively, cutting the plasma peak concentrations of cytokines [37] without a measurable effect on plasma cytokines levels or elimination of other unmeasured vasodilatory or inflammatory mediators [9,[38][39][40] could have explained the observed systemic hemodynamic effects of haemofiltration. Finally, removal of sedative drugs leading to an increased sympathetic drive of animals cannot be completely excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CVVH is used with the conviction that convective therapy removes cytokines and reduces the effects of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome. However, controlled studies have failed to show a significant or sustained reduction in cytokine plasma concentrations with CVVH or an improvement in outcome (76)(77)(78)(79)(80)(81). A recent meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of hemofiltration with hemodialysis for the treatment of AKI found no benefit of CVVH in survival or clinical outcomes, such as RRT dependence, organ dysfunction, or vasopressor use, and instead, it led to shorter filter life (82).…”
Section: Rrt Modality Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%