2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.103.014501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Helicity and Rotation on the Free Decay of Turbulent Flows

Abstract: The self-similar decay of energy in a turbulent flow is studied in direct numerical simulations with and without rotation. Two initial conditions are considered: one nonhelical (mirror symmetric) and one with maximal helicity. While in the absence of rotation the energy in the helical and nonhelical cases decays with the same rate, in rotating flows the helicity content has a major impact on the decay rate. These differences are associated with differences in the energy and helicity cascades when rotation is p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the nonhelical TG flow, the decay seems to follow a power law ∼(t * − t) −1 , after an initial ideal (inviscid) phase. This result is expected on the basis of the slow-down of nonlinear interactions (leading to energy transfer and its decay) because of waves, and a similar power-law decay has already been observed for stratified flows [24], for rotating flows [49], as well as for flows in the presence of a magnetic field [50]. For the ABC stratified flow, the decay of energy is substantially slower, with a power law of −1/3 as opposed to −1.…”
Section: Energy Decaysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Considering the nonhelical TG flow, the decay seems to follow a power law ∼(t * − t) −1 , after an initial ideal (inviscid) phase. This result is expected on the basis of the slow-down of nonlinear interactions (leading to energy transfer and its decay) because of waves, and a similar power-law decay has already been observed for stratified flows [24], for rotating flows [49], as well as for flows in the presence of a magnetic field [50]. For the ABC stratified flow, the decay of energy is substantially slower, with a power law of −1/3 as opposed to −1.…”
Section: Energy Decaysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This has been done in various studies over the last decades for homogeneous isotropic turbulence (HIT). Experimentally, the focus of attention was on grid-induced turbulence [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], whereas in numerical simulations periodic boundary conditions were used [16][17][18][19]. To what degree the decay of the turbulence depends on the initial conditions [20][21][22] and whether or not it is selfsimilar has controversially been debated [5,11,16,[23][24][25][26][27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical balance with polarization alignment argument presented by Nazarenko and Scheckochihin [27] is an attempt to explain the k −2 ⊥ energy spectra observed in several numerical simulations of rotating turbulence [17,21,22,55]. However, as is evident from Figure 5 and the corresponding sketch in [27], the critical balance with polarization alignment leads to a departure from anisotropy and is a path to the recovery of isotropic scales that are prevalent above the Zeeman wavenumber [23].…”
Section: Hierarchy Of Slow Manifolds In Anisotropic Wave Turbulence Dmentioning
confidence: 94%