2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.04.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heat-treatment temperature on microstructures and mechanical properties of Co–Cr–Mo alloys fabricated by selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
53
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It was indicated that heat treatment at 800°C for 20 minutes promotes the formation of ε-Co and intermetallic precipitations and/or carbides (Figure 11, [38]). According to Kajima et al [34], heat treatment at 800°C for 6 h can lead to a volume fraction of around 20-25% ε-Co in SLM samples. e formation of the second phases in a sufficient fine distribution (high undercooling) could be the origin of the observed increase in the mechanical values.…”
Section: Heat-treated Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was indicated that heat treatment at 800°C for 20 minutes promotes the formation of ε-Co and intermetallic precipitations and/or carbides (Figure 11, [38]). According to Kajima et al [34], heat treatment at 800°C for 6 h can lead to a volume fraction of around 20-25% ε-Co in SLM samples. e formation of the second phases in a sufficient fine distribution (high undercooling) could be the origin of the observed increase in the mechanical values.…”
Section: Heat-treated Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is suggests that the metastable c-Co is present in the as-built condition, which is comparable with a recently published study on heat treatments of additively manufactured Co-Cr-Mo. According to Kajima et al [34], ε-Co is only present after an additional heat treatment and the volume fraction between c-Co and ε-Co varies upon the heattreatment temperature, with c-Co remaining as the predominant phase (≥75% volume fraction). e transformation of c-Co to ε-Co is dependent on the grain size, and for finegrained structures (as is the case in SLM), this transformation is suppressed, resulting in the predominant c-Co [35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11, adapted from [38]). According to Kajima et al [34] Figure 12, adapted from [38]. During cooling the observed volume undergoes several post-heating by additive forming of further layers on top of the observed volume, hence, it is possible that a considerable fraction of −Co can be generated via alterations on the process conduct [10].…”
Section: Heat Treated Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLM is a layer-by-layer process with the same thickness in each layer, so ρ actually represents the molding speed without considering the layering time of each layer. The forming speed is proportional to the laser scanning speed and the lap joint [ 45 ]. E = P / v ·h ·n …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%