2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.05.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heat treatment on hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of 7085 aluminum alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This activation energy is lower than that of the Al-Zn-Mg-Er-Zr alloy reported by Wu [25] (189.67 kJ mol −1 ), but much higher than the bulk self-diffusion activation energy (142 kJ mol −1 ) of pure aluminum, indicating that dislocation cross-slip is the main deformation mechanism. Thus, the softening mechanism is dynamic recovery [26,27].…”
Section: ( ) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This activation energy is lower than that of the Al-Zn-Mg-Er-Zr alloy reported by Wu [25] (189.67 kJ mol −1 ), but much higher than the bulk self-diffusion activation energy (142 kJ mol −1 ) of pure aluminum, indicating that dislocation cross-slip is the main deformation mechanism. Thus, the softening mechanism is dynamic recovery [26,27].…”
Section: ( ) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e material constants are listed in Table 1, and equation (8) is the Arrhenius-type constitutive models for the AA6061 alloy under PSC with the activation energy Q of 175.836 kJ/mol. e Q is an important parameter serving as an indicator of difficulty degree in plasticity deformation, which is closely related to deformation mode in addition to alloy content and heat treatment [32,[34][35][36]. [22,37,38].…”
Section: Advances In Materials Science and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Sitdikov [18] compared the structural evolutionary law and microstructural deformation mechanism of 7475 aluminum alloy under high-temperature, multi-directional, and unidirectional compression, the author did not thoroughly illustrate the production of forging defects. Khaleed [19][20][21] performed a numerical simulation of closed forging of #45 steel connecting rods using three blanks with different shapes and concluded the optimal shape and dimension of blanks. However, the stress-strain field during the forging process was superficially discussed.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%