2018
DOI: 10.1590/0104-1428.12416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heat cycling on melting and crystallization of PHB/TiO2 compounds

Abstract: ObstractCompounds of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) with filler content between 1% and 10% were prepared in a laboratory internal mixer. The effect of heating and cooling rates on the crystallization and melting of PHB/TiO 2 compounds was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Melt and cold crystallization rates rise with increasing cooling/heating rates. A higher cooling rate translates to a lower melt crystallization temperature, while a higher heating rate resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P­(3HB) and PHBV3% both displayed one unique and narrow melting peak centered at around T m1 = 176.5 °C for P­(3HB) and T m1 = 174.5 °C for PHBV3% and crystallization temperatures of around 82 °C ( T c = 81.9 °C for P­(3HB) and T c = 82.8 °C for PHBV3%). These temperatures meet the results reported in the literature. The thermal behavior of PHBV18% was quite different from the ones observed for the two commercial PHAs, with, however, little difference between the two levels of purification. For PHBV18%-P1 and PHBV18%-P2, crystallization occurred at a higher temperature than for P­(3HB) and PHBV3%, i.e., T c = 96.7 °C for PHBV18%-P1 and T c = 97.4 °C for PHBV18%-P2.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…P­(3HB) and PHBV3% both displayed one unique and narrow melting peak centered at around T m1 = 176.5 °C for P­(3HB) and T m1 = 174.5 °C for PHBV3% and crystallization temperatures of around 82 °C ( T c = 81.9 °C for P­(3HB) and T c = 82.8 °C for PHBV3%). These temperatures meet the results reported in the literature. The thermal behavior of PHBV18% was quite different from the ones observed for the two commercial PHAs, with, however, little difference between the two levels of purification. For PHBV18%-P1 and PHBV18%-P2, crystallization occurred at a higher temperature than for P­(3HB) and PHBV3%, i.e., T c = 96.7 °C for PHBV18%-P1 and T c = 97.4 °C for PHBV18%-P2.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, PHB exhibits good mechanical and oxygen barrier properties. Moreover, it is stable under normal usage conditions but undergoes rapid biodegradation under composting conditions [ 14 ]. Nevertheless, PHB is susceptible to thermal degradation, has a narrow processing window, and shows severe post-process embrittlement, which reduces the applicability of this biopolymer [ 3 , 10 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 15 a,b shows the relative crystallinity and crystallization rate of pure PA6 and blends, respectively. The relative crystallinity curves of pure PA6 and its blends had a sigmoidal shape, suggesting phase transformation [ 60 , 61 ]. Compared with other formulations, the crystallization process started at higher temperatures for pure PA6 and PA6/ABS (10%) blend.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%