Abstract:SummaryBackground: Utilization and dosage of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) remain low. Recent data suggest that care of patients with CHF in specialized heart failure programs is associated with improved clinical outcomes.Hypothesis: Specialized heart failure care is associated with better utilization and higher dose of cardiovascular drugs.Methods: Data from 133 patients with CHF referred to a heart failure program were analyzed. Mean functional cl… Show more
“…The programs of HF clinics increase the use and doses of recommended medications 355,356 . HF is the most common cause of hospitalization in patients >65 years, who also have a high Care in the traditional home Care in the multidisciplinary home Association of Clinics and Monitoring Methods risk of early rehospitalization (29-47% in 3 to 6 months).…”
Section: Home Hospitalization (Table 57)mentioning
“…The programs of HF clinics increase the use and doses of recommended medications 355,356 . HF is the most common cause of hospitalization in patients >65 years, who also have a high Care in the traditional home Care in the multidisciplinary home Association of Clinics and Monitoring Methods risk of early rehospitalization (29-47% in 3 to 6 months).…”
Section: Home Hospitalization (Table 57)mentioning
“…In two large European HF study populations the actual use of metolazone was 1.3-2.2% [5,6]. In contrast, proportions as high as 23% being treated with metolazone have been reported in specialized heart failure clinics [7]. The motivation to use metolazone in HF is based on studies generally conducted in small populations prior to the standard use of ACE-inhibitors and betablockers during the last three decades.…”
The literature review and the observational study support the use of low-dose metolazone (< or =5 mg) on top of oral loop diuretics, as an effective and relatively safe treatment in contemporary outpatients with refractory HF.
“…4 Approximately 10% of patients with congestive heart failure receive treatment with amiodarone. 5 However several serious side-effects such as pneumonitis, skin reactions, liver function abnormalities and thyroid disorders have been reported after exposure to amiodarone. 6 These toxic effects seem to be related to the total dose of amiodarone administered.…”
SUMMARYPurpose To obtain risk estimates of thyroid disorder in patients starting amiodarone. Methods We followed a cohort of 5522 patients with a first prescription for an anti-arrhythmic drug and no previous use of thyroid drugs. Within this cohort we conducted a nested case-control analysis. Cases were defined as all patients who started a thyreomimetic or thyreostatic drug no sooner than 3 months after the start of an anti-arrhythmic drug. Controls were patients with a comparable follow-up period not receiving any thyroid drugs during the observation period. Results We identified 123 cases who had started thyreostatic drugs and 96 cases who had started a thyreomimetic drug. In users of amiodarone we found an adjusted odds ratio of 6.3 (3.9-10.2) for hyperthyroidism and 6.6 (3.9-11.1) for hypothyroid disease compared to users of other antiarrhythmics. Patients who were exposed to a cumulative dose exceeding 144 g of amiodarone had an adjusted odds ratio of 12.9 (6.1-27.3) for the development of hyperthyroid disease. The dose response for development of hypothyroidism was less pronounced. Conclusions We observed an increased risk for thyroid disorder at the high end of that reported in the literature. The risk of thyroid disorder increased with exposure to higher cumulative doses. Clinicians should keep in mind the possibility of development of thyroid disorders in patients on treatment with amiodarone even after several years of use.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.