2012
DOI: 10.5849/forsci.11-069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Harvest Residue Management on Tree Productivity and Carbon Pools during Early Stand Development in a Loblolly Pine Plantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the complete biomass removal treatment (FTB) only retained a minor amount of logging debris (<0.2 Mg·ha −1 ). The differences in slash retention between the SO and FT reported in this study are less than those commonly reported in the literature (23.1 Mg·ha −1 (Wei et al 2012); 25 Mg·ha −1 (Maier et al 2012); 26 Mg·ha −1 (Egnell and Valinger 2003); 37 Mg·ha −1 (Kabzems 2012)), but these other trials were designed as complete slash removal treatments (i.e., mechanical harvesting following by manual cleaning to remove all logging debris from the full-tree treatment plots) as opposed to the operational FT treatments (i.e., broken limbs and tops from the harvest and forwarding operations were retained on the treatment plots) applied in this study. As acknowledged by Egnell and Leijon (1999) and Egnell and Valinger (2003), approximately 30% additional logging residue biomass is commonly left behind after full-tree harvesting operations (Eriksson 1993;Ralevic et al 2010).…”
Section: Slash Loadings For Biomass Removal Treatmentscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…As expected, the complete biomass removal treatment (FTB) only retained a minor amount of logging debris (<0.2 Mg·ha −1 ). The differences in slash retention between the SO and FT reported in this study are less than those commonly reported in the literature (23.1 Mg·ha −1 (Wei et al 2012); 25 Mg·ha −1 (Maier et al 2012); 26 Mg·ha −1 (Egnell and Valinger 2003); 37 Mg·ha −1 (Kabzems 2012)), but these other trials were designed as complete slash removal treatments (i.e., mechanical harvesting following by manual cleaning to remove all logging debris from the full-tree treatment plots) as opposed to the operational FT treatments (i.e., broken limbs and tops from the harvest and forwarding operations were retained on the treatment plots) applied in this study. As acknowledged by Egnell and Leijon (1999) and Egnell and Valinger (2003), approximately 30% additional logging residue biomass is commonly left behind after full-tree harvesting operations (Eriksson 1993;Ralevic et al 2010).…”
Section: Slash Loadings For Biomass Removal Treatmentscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Additional stabilization mechanisms include physical (aggregation, inclusion into small pore volumes) and biochemical (proportion of recalcitrant compounds such as lignin) protection (Balesdent et al, 2000;Swift, 2001;Six et al, 2002) which may account for up to 21% of a soil's protective capacity (Hassink and Whitmore, 1997). This concept of a C saturation point for soils is supported by our research here and also by long term agricultural research projects where there was little to no increase in soil C despite repeated inputs of organic matter (Campbell et al, 1991;Paustian et al, 1997;Solberg et al, 1997), although the recent study by Maier et al (2012) represents a notable exception.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…This is due to both high soil C concentrations and relatively high bulk densities across the strata. This compares to 171 Mg ha À1 in the top 60 cm in the control plots of a 6-year-old loblolly pine stand in the coastal plain of South Carolina (Maier et al, 2012) and 163 Mg ha À1 in the top 60 cm of 32-yearold black spruce sites in Ontario (Major et al, 2012) although the latter study displayed extremely high soil C concentrations in the 0-10 depth due to a thick layer of organic matter and then soil C concentrations dropped precipitously with depth. One of the highest soil C contents (>400 Mg ha À1 to a 70 cm depth) reported were by Gower et al (1997) in old-growth boreal black spruce stands which had 20-50 cm of high C containing peat over mineral soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Pinus taeda planted on former agricultural land in southwest Georgia contained 268 Mg C/ha in the upper 0.3 m of soil (Johnsen et al 2013) and a Pinus taeda plantation in the coastal plain of South Carolina contained 171 Mg C/ha in the upper 0.6 m (Maier et al 2012). Highly productive sites can retain large quantities of soil C as well as support stands with higher productivity, and soil C and consequently ecosystem C were related to SI in this study.…”
Section: Density and Ecosystem Cmentioning
confidence: 57%