1961
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1961.tb01285.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Guanethidine in Revealing Cholinergic Sympathetic Fibres

Abstract: Guanethidine abolished the inhibitory response of segments of rabbit intestine to stimulation of the sympathetic nerves which accompany the mesenteric arteries. In the majority of experiments a motor response of the intestinal segment was then revealed; it was more readily observed in intestinal segments from young than from adult rabbits. The motor response of the intestine to sympathetic stimulation after guanethidine was blocked by atropine. It was not blocked by hexamethonium and was present in rabbits in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
1

Year Published

1962
1962
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results are consistent with the 'on' contractions being mediated entirely via enteric neurons, because they were completely blocked by hexamethonium. This has been previously described for longitudinal muscle contractions evoked by MN stimulation (Day & Rand, 1961;De Luca & Rand, 1990). This effect of hexamethonium suggests that the extrinsic primary afferents act on interneurons or intrinsic sensory neurons, rather than directly on excitatory motor neurons, which is consistent with an earlier observation that MN stimulation depolarizes some intrinsic sensory neurons in the guinea-pig ileum (Takaki & Nakayama, 1988).…”
Section: Excitatory Effects Of Mn Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The present results are consistent with the 'on' contractions being mediated entirely via enteric neurons, because they were completely blocked by hexamethonium. This has been previously described for longitudinal muscle contractions evoked by MN stimulation (Day & Rand, 1961;De Luca & Rand, 1990). This effect of hexamethonium suggests that the extrinsic primary afferents act on interneurons or intrinsic sensory neurons, rather than directly on excitatory motor neurons, which is consistent with an earlier observation that MN stimulation depolarizes some intrinsic sensory neurons in the guinea-pig ileum (Takaki & Nakayama, 1988).…”
Section: Excitatory Effects Of Mn Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly Day & Rand (1961) carried out experiments on cat isolated atria in which they stimulated the sympathetic fibres at 50 shocks/sec. When guanethidine was added to the bath to block the release of noradrenaline, stimulation produced well-marked inhibitory effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of investigations in this field are often contradictory and many issues remain the subject of controversy (Chang & Rand, 1960;Day & Rand, 1961;Gillespie & MacKenna, 1961;Bentley, 1962).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%