2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of grinding parameters on surface quality, microstructure and rolling contact fatigue behaviors of gear steel for vacuum pump

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the detailed information concerning main effects plots of surface roughness related to different grinding parameters, it can be known that surface roughness increased when feed speed raised from 0.19 m/s to 0.26 m/s and decreased at higher grinding depth and grinding speed, Figure 16. Surface roughness was positively related to feed speed [3]. With higher level of feed speed, more materials were removed by the grinding wheel per unit time, contributing to deeper scratches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the detailed information concerning main effects plots of surface roughness related to different grinding parameters, it can be known that surface roughness increased when feed speed raised from 0.19 m/s to 0.26 m/s and decreased at higher grinding depth and grinding speed, Figure 16. Surface roughness was positively related to feed speed [3]. With higher level of feed speed, more materials were removed by the grinding wheel per unit time, contributing to deeper scratches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At specific grinding depth and feed speed, the increase of grinding speed from 26 m/s to 34 m/s led to the decrease of roughness on vertical direction, the mechanism could be concluded as two aspects. On the one hand, with increased grinding speed, the number of effective sharpening edges passing through the grinding zone per unit time increased, while the height of the scratches was decreased, resulting in a decrease in the thickness of a single abrasive grain [3]. It contributed to a decrease of surface roughness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the grinding depth increased to 0.03 mm, the surface roughness was deteriorated and increased to ~0.60 μm. Obviously, the increase in grinding depth produced a higher level of grinding force and grinding temperature and the material was squeezed by abrasive particles and flowed plastically to both sides, resulting in the increase in surface roughness [ 34 ]. At a grinding depth of 0.02 mm when the feed speed increased from 0.26 m/s to 0.35 m/s, and at the grinding depth of 0.03 mm when the feed speed increased from 0.19 m/s to 0.26 m/s, the decrease in Sa was less than 0.034 μm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using mechanical processing, the correct choice of abrasive grain size is crucial. Too small a grit size can cause the contaminants to be smeared across the surface, whereas coarse grit sizes create deep scratches and craters on the surface, which can cause changes in the properties of the surface layer [ 43 , 44 ]. The machining process should be followed by a final degreasing process to remove dust, dirt, grease, and other contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%