1955
DOI: 10.2527/jas1955.144947x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Grinding and Pelleting upon Digestibility of a Ration by Lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following year Sullivan et al (1956) noted that crude fiber was inadequate as an estimate of carbohydrate availability and suggested the use of cellulose and lignin. Likewise, nutritive value was presented in two 1955 articles in the Journal of Animal Science and expressed as proximate analyses (Fontenot et al, 1955; Long et al, 1955). Three articles appeared in a similar form in 1956 (Erwin et al, 1956; Lloyd et al, 1956; Watkins and Kearns, 1956).…”
Section: Assessing Nutritive Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following year Sullivan et al (1956) noted that crude fiber was inadequate as an estimate of carbohydrate availability and suggested the use of cellulose and lignin. Likewise, nutritive value was presented in two 1955 articles in the Journal of Animal Science and expressed as proximate analyses (Fontenot et al, 1955; Long et al, 1955). Three articles appeared in a similar form in 1956 (Erwin et al, 1956; Lloyd et al, 1956; Watkins and Kearns, 1956).…”
Section: Assessing Nutritive Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is a criterion of the metabolic activity of this tissue, these observations suggest, irrespective of the gross observation noted above, that metabolic activity of the rumen epithelium is not affected by physical form of feed. Long et al (1955) and Blaxter et al (1955) reported that grinding and pelleting long hay rations lowered ration digestibility. The latter author reported an accelerated passage of feed through the gastro intestinal tract when the ration was ground and pelleted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of a benefit associated with feed processing for finishing feedlot cattle, however, differs greatly from benefits associated with pelleting finishing feedlot lamb diets. Long et al (1955) reported increased DMD of pelleted complete diets fed to finishing lambs compared to ground diets of identical ingredient composition. reported no effect of feeding pure pelleted alfalfa hay on OMD of finishing lambs when compared to chopped alfalfa hay.…”
Section: Feed Processingmentioning
confidence: 97%