2022
DOI: 10.3390/math10111877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental Performance: Case of Mexican Manufacturing Companies

Abstract: Managers implement several Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) practices to improve sustainability and economic performance, such as environmental management systems (EMS), eco-design (ED), source reduction (SR) and attending to external environmental management (EEM) requirements; however, the relationship among them requires a deep study. This paper reports the case of the Mexican maquiladora industry, analyzing the main relationships among GSCM practices with environmental impact (EI) and environmental cos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This urges firms to use the best GSCM practices to attain a competitive advantage over others and enhance EP. This is supported by past research findings (Ahmed et al, 2020;Awaliyah & Haryanto, 2022;Bryson, 2018;Yong et al, 2020), but it is inconsistent with the study findings of (García Alcaraz et al, 2022;Zhang, Wang, & Zhao, 2019).…”
Section: Mediation and Moderation Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This urges firms to use the best GSCM practices to attain a competitive advantage over others and enhance EP. This is supported by past research findings (Ahmed et al, 2020;Awaliyah & Haryanto, 2022;Bryson, 2018;Yong et al, 2020), but it is inconsistent with the study findings of (García Alcaraz et al, 2022;Zhang, Wang, & Zhao, 2019).…”
Section: Mediation and Moderation Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…This urges firms to use the best GSCM practices to attain a competitive advantage over others and enhance EP. This is supported by past research findings (Ahmed et al, 2020; Awaliyah & Haryanto, 2022; Bryson, 2018; Yong et al, 2020), but it is inconsistent with the study findings of (García Alcaraz et al, 2022; Zhang, Wang, & Zhao, 2019). A possible reason for these discrepancies in this current study's result to these prior studies outcomes could be that an intense focus on SCCA might lead organizations to disregard the concerns and expectations of stakeholders, including customers, communities, and regulators, who are increasingly demanding environmentally responsible practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…An emerging novel stratagem in supply-chain management inspired our interest in the impact of green supply-chain management practices on environmental performance (García Alcaraz et al 2022; Seman et al 2019; Silva, Gomes and Sarkis 2019). Because making this relationship successful involves challenges, such as possible unwillingness to gamble on investing in it (Batrazovna et al 2020), it is worthy of deeper study.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a recently developing supply-chain management stratagem has stimulated interest in the impact of ‘green’ supply-chain management practices on environmental performance (Çankaya and Sezen 2019; García Alcaraz et al 2022), there are obstacles to making this relationship successful. For instance, some business executives may suspect a high-cost, low-benefit scenario and not be willing to invest in strengthening it (Batrazovna et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents' demography So, the relationship between variables yields reliable results. In addition, by including group evaluations and mean, it is able to analyze complicated relationships and many hypotheses, something that other prototypes and models cannot achieve(García Alcaraz et al 2022). Focusing on the advantages of this method, we applied it in this study owing to its efficacy in establishing the relationship between all investigated factors(Hock-Doepgen et al 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%