2020
DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of grazing exclusion and rotational grazing on labile soil organic carbon in north China

Abstract: Overgrazing has caused serious grassland soil deterioration and significant soil organic carbon (SOC) losses. Controlled grazing is recommended for restoring grassland and enhancing SOC stocks. Studies have suggested that, in particular, labile organic carbon (C) is a sensitive indicator for soil degradation and SOC recovery, but few studies of the effect of different grassland management practices have been published so far. Here, we investigate the effects of long‐term grazing exclusion and short‐term rotati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we found grazing remarkably decreased labile organic C (DOC, MBC, and POC), which could be attributed to the decrease in plant C input. Aboveground and belowground biomass decreased by 15–43% and 11–29% with the increasing of grazing intensity at our experimental site (Figure S4), which in turn decreased the contribution of litter inputs and root exudates to labile organic C. Our result is consistent with previous reports that grazing could significantly decrease the labile organic C fraction in comparison with grazing exclusion (Dong et al, 2021; Wiesmeier et al, 2012). Labile organic C, relatively young organic C fractions with high turnover rates, have been widely used as an indicator of SOC dynamics (Six, Merckx, Kimpe, Paustian, & Elliott, 2000) since it is more sensitive to disturbance than total SOC (Spohn & Giani, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, we found grazing remarkably decreased labile organic C (DOC, MBC, and POC), which could be attributed to the decrease in plant C input. Aboveground and belowground biomass decreased by 15–43% and 11–29% with the increasing of grazing intensity at our experimental site (Figure S4), which in turn decreased the contribution of litter inputs and root exudates to labile organic C. Our result is consistent with previous reports that grazing could significantly decrease the labile organic C fraction in comparison with grazing exclusion (Dong et al, 2021; Wiesmeier et al, 2012). Labile organic C, relatively young organic C fractions with high turnover rates, have been widely used as an indicator of SOC dynamics (Six, Merckx, Kimpe, Paustian, & Elliott, 2000) since it is more sensitive to disturbance than total SOC (Spohn & Giani, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Rotational grazing feeds animals in different fields in rotation depending on the forage condition. Both exclosure and rotational grazing are believed to be good strategies that have proved effective in protecting vegetation 58 . In addition, restgrazing allows grazing fields to be rested and grazed on a rotational base.…”
Section: Carbon Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several policies (e.g., Prohibiting Grazing Policy and Returning Grazing Lands to Grasslands) were implemented to restore the degraded grassland in northern China. When grazing is excluded, as the input of organic matter increases, it may have a beneficial effect on soil organic carbon (SOC) and physical structure, but excessive litter accumulation on the surface soil immobilizes organic carbon (Reeder and Schuman, 2002) and inhibits plant growth (Xiong and Nilsson, 1999;Dong et al, 2021). So, long-term absence of grazing may inhibit important ecosystem functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%