2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1144/1/012060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of grain size and moisture content on major and minor elements concentrations using portable X-ray fluorescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The XRF intensities of six metals decreased about 15%–20% by adding the water in 30 mass%. The similar results were reported in many previous studies 11–17 . Ge et al 14 explained that the reason why the XRF intensities decreased due to the soil moisture was replaced by water particles from the air in the soil pores and fractures, which enhanced the absorption of fluorescent X‐rays.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The XRF intensities of six metals decreased about 15%–20% by adding the water in 30 mass%. The similar results were reported in many previous studies 11–17 . Ge et al 14 explained that the reason why the XRF intensities decreased due to the soil moisture was replaced by water particles from the air in the soil pores and fractures, which enhanced the absorption of fluorescent X‐rays.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On the other hand, a successful on‐site XRF analysis of soil samples requires appropriate correction of various interfering factors caused by differences in sample matrix, 7,8 mineral morphology, 9 particle size, 10–13 and moisture content 11–17 . The soil moisture effect that is often regarded as a matrix effect was reported in some literatures that XRF intensities of analytes in soil, especially for low Z element, generally decrease by effect of soil moisture, thereby the quantitative results of analyte in wet soil are estimated lower than those in dry soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent with previous studies that reported the impacts of sample moisture (Nuchdang et al 2018, Padilla et al 2019), and sample thickness (Liu et al 2018, Padilla et al 2019) on pXRF data collected from soil samples. Extended scan times were not found to result in significant data gains, which is supported by findings by Williams et al (2020), however is contrary to findings by Zhang et al (2021), which found extended (5 minute) scan times reduced variability in results when scanning bone through soft tissue.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, measurements using pXRF may be affected by various physicochemical parameters of the matrix being measured, such as moisture, surface irregularity, mineralogy, and spectral interferences [11]. For soil, for instance, moisture and grain size are the most important parameters to consider due to their effects on pXRF measurements [12]. This underscores the need to establish ideal working conditions before applying this technique to new matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%