2006
DOI: 10.1163/156856106778456564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of grafting of acrylic acid onto PET film surfaces by UV irradiation on the adhesion of PSAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One advantage of the acrylic primer over a metallic sticking layer such as Cr is that the primer is graft copolymerized onto the PET surface, which enables it to stretch with the underlying PET substrate. [32][33][34][35] As a result, acrylic-primer-coated PET substrates show elongations over 100% without rupture. Cr sticking layers, on the other hand, are intrinsically brittle and form channel cracks at small strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage of the acrylic primer over a metallic sticking layer such as Cr is that the primer is graft copolymerized onto the PET surface, which enables it to stretch with the underlying PET substrate. [32][33][34][35] As a result, acrylic-primer-coated PET substrates show elongations over 100% without rupture. Cr sticking layers, on the other hand, are intrinsically brittle and form channel cracks at small strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyacrylamide was chosen as the ideal soft substrate due to its common usage in mechanobiology research, established mechanical/chemical stability, and high porosity that would allow diffusion of waste and nutrient products. PET Transwells were chosen due to high transparency for imaging, and the range of options for chemical modification [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] . We also considered and trialed several other strategies to functionalise the PET including surface activation with oxygen plasma, silane treatment, and polydopamine coating, however these were discounted as either ineffective due to poor efficacy or undesirable due to the requirement for specialist equipment that may not be available in standard cell culture laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C1s core-level spectra were curve-fitted into two peak components with binding energies at 284.6 and 288.5eV, corresponding to the C-C/C-H and O-C=O functional groups, respectively [18][19][20][21]. In addition, a peak was observed at 283.9eV in the C1s spectra, which was assigned to inhomogeneous charging effect on the polymer surface due to its insulating nature [22].…”
Section: Xps Analysis Xps (Multi Lab 2000 Spectrometer Thermomentioning
confidence: 99%