2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Gradation and Particle Shape on Small-Strain Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio of Sands

Abstract: The influence of gradation and particle shape on the small-strain Young's modulus of dry sands is investigated through a comprehensive set of resonant column tests in the flexural mode of vibration. Experiments are performed on an array of sands with different coefficients of uniformity and particle shapes. The effect of gradation is investigated using tests on sands with similar particle shapes. The effect of particle shape is then examined through the experimental results on sands with a range of particle sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the total number of the random samples for the development of a machine-learning model was 12,880 (=10 × 1288) to find uSSI,NL responses following the multistep analysis procedure proposed in Section 2.2. The Poisson's ratio (ν) and shear wave velocity (V s ) of soil ranged from 0.15 to 0.5 and ranged from 90 to 760 m/s, and were selected to cover soft clay (high ν and low V s ) to dense sand (low ν and high V s ) [31,36,37]. In addition, a shallow circular foundation was assumed in this study with a range of 0.09 to 0.7 for the ratio of structure to foundation mass.…”
Section: Input Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the total number of the random samples for the development of a machine-learning model was 12,880 (=10 × 1288) to find uSSI,NL responses following the multistep analysis procedure proposed in Section 2.2. The Poisson's ratio (ν) and shear wave velocity (V s ) of soil ranged from 0.15 to 0.5 and ranged from 90 to 760 m/s, and were selected to cover soft clay (high ν and low V s ) to dense sand (low ν and high V s ) [31,36,37]. In addition, a shallow circular foundation was assumed in this study with a range of 0.09 to 0.7 for the ratio of structure to foundation mass.…”
Section: Input Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simulate the primary waves, similar correlations are adopted to evaluate the vertical seismic acceleration (a v ). It should be noted that is considered to be equal to 1.87 based on a practical assumption 77,78 for the Poisson's ratio to be 0.3. The dominant period of the incident wave for the computation of the angular frequency (2 ∕ ) is practically assumed 22 to be 1/3.…”
Section: Modified Pseudo-dynamic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining fines fraction F F ≈ 33% contributes to support loads. Our analysis classifies this soil as GF(F) assuming the following input parameters: roundness R G ¼ 0.35, uniformity C u;G ¼ 1.82 for very angular and subrounded gravel mixture; R S ¼ 0.55, C u;S ¼ 1.10 for Nepean sand (Payan et al (2017); and liquid limit LL ¼ 30 for fines (R S ¼ 0.55 for subrounded grains). The discussers suggest it is G( ).…”
Section: Ternary Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%