2019
DOI: 10.33012/2019.16742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of GPS III Weighted Voting on P(Y) Receiver Processing Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a pseudorandom sequence, the signal generator then toggles between transmission of the MV combination and transmission of uncombined L1C-P and P(Y) signals for the specified fractions of time. As discussed in Dafesh and Kahn (2009) and Allen et al (2019), the specified power ratios are achieved by transmitting the majority voting combination for only 68.5% of the time, while transmitting pure L1C-P or P(Y) signals for averages of 25% and 6.5%, respectively.…”
Section: L1 Signal Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a pseudorandom sequence, the signal generator then toggles between transmission of the MV combination and transmission of uncombined L1C-P and P(Y) signals for the specified fractions of time. As discussed in Dafesh and Kahn (2009) and Allen et al (2019), the specified power ratios are achieved by transmitting the majority voting combination for only 68.5% of the time, while transmitting pure L1C-P or P(Y) signals for averages of 25% and 6.5%, respectively.…”
Section: L1 Signal Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%