2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor duration on the clinical prognosis of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with no-/slow-reflow phenomenon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the lack of sufficient and reliable clinical data to validate standard treatment for GPIs, the 2021 ACC guidelines merely recommend intravenous administration of GPIs for at least 18 h in high-risk or thrombus-burdened situations (class IIa) [ 29 , 30 ]. In terms of maintenance time, the latest research showed that the maintenance time of tirofiban for <24 h and ≥24 h had similar clinical effects, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE, cardiac function, and in-hospital bleeding events between the two groups of patients, indicating that the maintenance time of tirofiban can be appropriately shortened [ 42 ]. Nevertheless, there is no recommendation for a specific route of administration and further exploration of specific methods of use is needed to maximize clinical benefits, therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to find the more efficient and safer administration of tirofiban.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the lack of sufficient and reliable clinical data to validate standard treatment for GPIs, the 2021 ACC guidelines merely recommend intravenous administration of GPIs for at least 18 h in high-risk or thrombus-burdened situations (class IIa) [ 29 , 30 ]. In terms of maintenance time, the latest research showed that the maintenance time of tirofiban for <24 h and ≥24 h had similar clinical effects, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE, cardiac function, and in-hospital bleeding events between the two groups of patients, indicating that the maintenance time of tirofiban can be appropriately shortened [ 42 ]. Nevertheless, there is no recommendation for a specific route of administration and further exploration of specific methods of use is needed to maximize clinical benefits, therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to find the more efficient and safer administration of tirofiban.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no significant differences in bleeding events between the two groups in 30 days and 180 days. [35] A total of 127 patients were divided into two groups based on the duration of tirofiban use (less and more than 24 h) in a cohort study. [36] There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, plaque condition, and coronary physiological function.…”
Section: Advances In the Treatment Of Cadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ингибиторы Gp IIb/IIIa, фактически продемонстрировали преимущества в клиническом исходе у пациентов с острым инфарктом миокарда, в сложных плановых процедурах чрескожного коронарного вме- [61,62]. Тем не менее, обнаружилось наличие индивидуальных вариаций в ответе на абциксимаб, что может приводить к неблагоприятным клиническим последствиям [63].…”
Section: Reviewunclassified