Effect of GLUMA desensitizer on the retention of full metal crowns cemented with Rely X U200 self-adhesive cement

Lawaf, Shirin; Jalalian, E; Roshan, Roshanak; Azizi, Arash

doi:10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.404

Cited by 7 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar observations were made in the study of Chandravarkar, S.M. and others [14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…Desensitizing agents are commonly applied in order to control pain, thus making dental procedures much more comfortable for patients that require fixed dental prostheses [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The Gluma, Shield Force Plus, and Telio CS desensitizers effectively decrease the post-preparation sensitivity, as has been shown in the study conducted in 2021 by Sayed, M.E.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Effect of Commercially Available Desensitizers on Bond Strength Following Cementation of Zirconia Crowns Using Self-Adhesive Resin Cement—An In Vitro Study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The improvement of the tensile strength of zirconia crowns after the application of commercially available desensitizers can provide added advantages for the durability and strength of zirconia prostheses. We assessed the retention of zirconia crowns when Gluma, Shield Force Plus, and Telio CS desensitizers were used with resin luting cement. Four groups with ten specimens each (n = 10) were considered as Group 1 (Control group, with no desensitizer application before crown cementation with resin cement) and Groups 2, 3, and 4 (with a single coat of Gluma dentin desensitizer, Telio CS desensitizer, or Shield Force Plus desensitizer applied before crown cementation, respectively). Thermocycling was then carried out, and each group was tested to determine the associated retentive forces and type of failure. The data were statistically analyzed, which showed that the mean tensile-strength values were significantly higher in Group 2 (p-value = 0.001), Group 3 (p-value = 0.027), and Group 4 (p-value = 0.014), when compared with the Control group. Clinicians should consider the application of any of these three desensitizers, as they can successfully abate dentin hypersensitivity after tooth preparation, as well as increase the durability and strength of the zirconia prosthesis.

show abstract

“…Similar observations were made in the study of Chandravarkar, S.M. and others [14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Commercially Available Desensitizers on Bond Strength Following Cementation of Zirconia Crowns Using Self-Adhesive Resin Cement—An In Vitro Study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Desensitizers act through dentinal tubules occlusion. While Gluma ® depends on the protein precipitation on the dentinal tubules [ 29 , 30 , 31 ], Soothe ® SDI and Nano P ® desensitizers act by forming fluoride compounds precipitates, forming an impermeable film that prevents access to external stimuli, sealing the exposed dentinal tubules [ 32 ]. In fact, these mechanisms are responsible for the differences found between Gluma ® and Soothe ® SDI, as it has been proved that fluor could decrease the bond strength of self-adhesive materials [ 33 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Different Desensitizers on Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The sealing and bonding characteristics of luting cements may be affected by the application of desensitizers containing ingredients that induce chemical interaction with dentin organic matrix. This study evaluated the effect of different desensitizers on the immediate and long-term shear bond strength (SBS) of a self-adhesive resin cement (SARC) to dentin. Healthy bovine dentin specimens were used for the study. Gluma® Desensitizer, Desensibilize Nano P®, and Soothe® desensitizer were used in study groups, while the control group did not receive any treatment. Next, SARC (RelyXTM U200) in cylindrical mold was applied to the sample surface. All specimens were stored at 37 °C for 24 h or six months and tested for SBS. Additionally, water contact angle was measured using an optical tensiometer. Results were analyzed by analysis of variance and Student-t tests (p ˂ 0.05). Application of the different types of desensitizers had no significant influence on immediate or long-term SBS of SARC to dentin (p > 0.05). Differences for water contact angle were not statistically significant among the tested groups (p = 0.450). Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that the application of the different types of desensitizers had no significant influence on the SBS of a SARC to dentin.

show abstract

“…Self-adhesive resin cements combine high strength and low solubility advantages of resin cements with the characteristic of etching and priming the dentin surface simultaneously without a need for acid application, making them highly attractive to the clinician (Sabatini, Patel, & D'Silva, 2013). RelyX U200, used in the study, is a recently introduced self-adhesive resin cement with an extra monomer and a new rheology modifier enhanced with filler particles (Lawaf, Jalalian, Roshan, & Azizi, 2016). Micromechanical interlocking was the most important adhesion mechanism of resin to dentin.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of a filled adhesive as the desensitizer on bond strength of “Self‐Adhesive Cements To” differently severity of fluorosed dentin

Tan

et al. 2018

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objectives were to evaluate the efficacy of a filled adhesive named Prime & Bond NT (P&B NT) as the dentin desensitizer in occluding fluorosis dentinal tubules and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cement (RXU) and RelyX Luting self-adhesive resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) before and after P&B NT pretreatment. 176 non-carious fluorosis were classified into four subgroups by the Thylstrup and Fejerskov index (TFI): normal group (TFI = 0), mild group (TFI = 1-3), moderate group (TFI = 4-5), severe group (TFI = 6-9). 160 composite cylinders (4 × 5 mm) were fabricated, then every severity of fluorosed dentin was subjected to four treatments: P&B NT + RXU (n = 40), RXU (n = 40), P&B NT + RMGIC (n = 40), RMGIC (n = 40). The specimens were immersed in water at 37°C for 24 hr first and half of them underwent 5,000 thermocycling before shear bond strength test. A factorial design (factorial 4 × 2 × 2 × 2) was developed to make statistical analysis. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis (n = 16) in cross section and longitudinal section view characterized the occlusion situation of dentinal tubules. P&B NT might occlude dentinal tubules as the dentin desensitizer for normal teeth and mild-moderate fluorosis. P&B NT significantly increased the SBS of RXU (p < .05) but had no statistical significance on the SBS of RMGIC (p > .05). RXU could benefit from P&B NT desensitization to achieve a better quality of adhesion.

show abstract

Effect of GLUMA desensitizer on the retention of full metal crowns cemented with Rely X U200 self-adhesive cement

Cited by 7 publications

References 23 publications

The Effect of Commercially Available Desensitizers on Bond Strength Following Cementation of Zirconia Crowns Using Self-Adhesive Resin Cement—An In Vitro Study

The Effect of Commercially Available Desensitizers on Bond Strength Following Cementation of Zirconia Crowns Using Self-Adhesive Resin Cement—An In Vitro Study

Effect of Different Desensitizers on Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin

Effect of a filled adhesive as the desensitizer on bond strength of “Self‐Adhesive Cements To” differently severity of fluorosed dentin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About