1995
DOI: 10.2514/3.46730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of geometry and mass distribution on tumbling characteristics of flying wings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their development histories are introduced, respectively, below. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], free spin [40], free tumble [41], and free fall [7]. A VFT architecture proposed by Standard Missile Company [85].…”
Section: Progress Of Vftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their development histories are introduced, respectively, below. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], free spin [40], free tumble [41], and free fall [7]. A VFT architecture proposed by Standard Missile Company [85].…”
Section: Progress Of Vftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental investigations showed that the tumbling modes are very sensitive to geometric and inertial characteristics of the aircraft [2]. The initial conditions also essentially in §uence the tumbling motion.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A problem similar in many aspects to that of sheet debris flight is the flutter, tumble and vortex induced autorotation of falling wings or plates. This could be considered a limit state of debris flight when the wind velocity is very small and was studied among others by Fremaux et al (1995), Mittal and Seshadri (2004) and Gallaway and Hankey (1985), who found in numerical simulations that free falling autorotating plates experienced considerably larger autorotation coefficients than those obtained at static angles of attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%