Effect of genotype and environment on seed quality in sweet narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.)

Cowling, Wallace; Tarr, A.

doi:10.1071/ar03223

Cited by 46 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the traits are furthermore characterised by higher genotypic variance than GE interaction variance, indicating a relatively constant ranking of genotypes across environments. These findings closely correspond to previous evaluation results about GE interaction of Australian L. angustifolius seed quality traits (Cowling and Tarr, 2004). Low GE interaction variances in comparison to high genotypic variance result in values of broad sense heritability higher than 50% for all traits.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…The overall mean of seed protein (32.5%) and seed oil (6.3%) content was comparable to L. angustifolius cultivars grown in Australia with 34.4% protein and 6.8% oil (Cowling and Tarr, 2004) and Poland with 33.0% protein and 6.8% oil (Sujak et al, 2006). The NSP content (49.2%) was comparable to those reported by Nalle et al (2011) (about 49%).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…In general, environmental influences seem to exceed genetic influences in trait variation (Jansen et al, 2005). This was also observed in a multi-environmental trial of Australian narrow-leafed lupin cultivars in which the environment always showed a larger effect on lupin seed quality than the genotype (Cowling and Tarr, 2004). Up to now, no evaluation of German narrow-leafed lupin breeding material regarding genetic variables and environmental stability of important seed quality and yield traits has been conducted.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 68%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of variability, heritability and environmental stability of seed quality and yield parameters of L. angustifolius

Beyer

Schmalenberg²,

Jansen

et al. 2015

Field Crops Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 68%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of variability, heritability and environmental stability of seed quality and yield parameters of L. angustifolius

Beyer

Schmalenberg²,

Jansen

et al. 2015

Field Crops Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Another literature data for linolenic acid are comparable to ours [8.88% in Mierlita (2015), 9.2% in Uzun et al (2007), 9.68% in Bhardwaj (2002) and 10.2% in Oomah and Bushuk (1984)]. The content of linolenic acid in seeds of narrow-leafed lupin, yellow lupin and Andean lupin was lower: 6.2, 4.2 and 2.6%, respectively (Petterson, 1998;Cowling and Tarr 2004) and 4.9, 8.13 and 2.86% (Rybiński et al 2014).…”

Section: Fat Content and Fatty Acid Compositionsupporting

confidence: 56%

Variability of fat content and fatty acids profiles in seeds of a Polish white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) collection

Rybiński

Świecicki

Bocianowski

et al. 2017

Genet Resour Crop Evol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper assess the variability of fat content and fatty acids profiles in seeds of a white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) domestic collection. The initial material comprised 371 accessions originated from 30 countries of Europe, Asia, Africa, North-and South America and Australia. According to data given by accession donors the material is divided into four classes of origin: wild lines, landraces, lines created by man and cultivars. Variability of fat content and fatty acids composition were estimated in seeds of each accession. The average fat content for analyzed collection is 9.81%. The broadest range of fat content was noticed for landraces and cultivars as compared to narrowest . In respect to unsaturated fatty acid (UFA), monounsaturated oleic acid in each of estimated classes of accessions was predominant and most abundant (55.7%) in broad range of minimummaximum values from 41.2 to 66.2%. The second examined monounsaturated fatty acid was erucic acid (1.74%) found in seeds of almost all studied accessions. An exception were four accessions defined similarly to rapeseeds as ''zero erucic'' forms. In seeds of few accessions a content of erucic acid exceeded 3%. Among polyunsaturated fatty acids linoleic FA (x-6) dominated followed by linolenic FA (x-3). Both FA were in the range 13.7-33.2% and 5.6-12.8% with mean values on the level 19.6 and 10.1%, respectively. As a consequence, the examined white lupin seeds showed a very favourable x-3/x-6 FA ratio (0.51), ranging from 0.21 to 0.87, much higher than that of most vegetable oils. Fat content was positively correlated with stearic and oleic fatty acids and negatively with palmitic, linoleic, linolenic and erucic acid.

show abstract

“…Therefore, further genetic development of lupin seeds should be monitored and evaluated for nutritive value if newer varieties bred for greater protein, fat, and reduced hull content be available for the pig industry. Other factors, apart from the processing effect, affecting the DE content of grains and legumes are season (Cowling and Tarr, 2004) and the duration of storage (Kim et al, Total NSP (nonstarch polysaccharide) = insoluble NSP + soluble NSP; sum of insoluble and soluble NSP was calculated using the following polymerization factor: sum of insoluble and soluble NSP = (Rha + Fuc + Rib) × 0.89 + (Ara + Xyl) × 0.88 + (Man + Gal + Glu) × 0.90 (see text for details of calculations).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Variation in digestible energy content of Australian sweet lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) and the development of prediction equations for its estimation1

Kim

Mullan

Heo

et al. 2009

Journal of Animal Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sixty-three male pigs (Landrace × Large White) weighing 49.5 ± 0.40 kg were used to (1) examine the variation in DE content of Lupinus angustifolius L. in relation to variety and geographical growing region and (2) establish prediction equations for DE content from physical and chemical composition. The pigs were randomly allocated to a 4 × 2 factorial treatment design with respective factors being 4 varieties (cv. Belara, Coromup, Mandelup, and Tanjil) and 2 growing locations (northern and southern agricultural areas of Western Australia). In addition, a wheat control diet was fed as a reference for calculation of lupin DE content. The lupins were ground through a hammer mill fitted with a 4-mm screen to a mean particle size of 888 μm. Pigs were fed their respective experimental diets at 3 times maintenance energy level [3 × (0.458 × BW 0.75 )/diet DE] in the study. The DE content of lupins ranged from 13.3 to 15.7 MJ/kg with a mean value of 14.2 MJ/kg. Variety of lupins affected (P < 0.01) the DE content, and lupins grown in the northern agricultural region had a greater DE content than the same lupins grown in the southern agricultural area (P < 0.01). Although the variation in DE content of lupins was mostly caused by significantly greater DE content of cv. Coromup grown in the northern agricultural region, the results suggest that genetic and environmental conditions during the growth of lupins have a significant impact on the utilization of energy in grower pigs. Simple regression analysis showed that prediction of DE content was possible from the proportion of hulls [R 2 = 0.88, residual SD (RSD) = 1.116, P < 0.001], 1,000-seed weight (R 2 = 0.77, RSD = 1.092, P < 0.01), and soluble arabinoxylan content (R 2 = 0.64, RSD = 1.072, P < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that adding total nonstarch polysaccharide (R 2 = 0.96, RSD = 1.187, P < 0.01) and soluble nonstarch polysaccharide (R 2 = 0.95, RSD = 1.200, P < 0.01) to the equation along with the proportion of hull and 1,000-seed weight significantly improved the accuracy of prediction. Results indicate that the DE content of lupins varies by up to 2.4 MJ/kg and that the DE content can be predicted with a good degree of accuracy using physical and chemical characteristics.

show abstract

Effect of genotype and environment on seed quality in sweet narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.)

Cited by 46 publications

References 7 publications

Evaluation of variability, heritability and environmental stability of seed quality and yield parameters of L. angustifolius

Evaluation of variability, heritability and environmental stability of seed quality and yield parameters of L. angustifolius

Variability of fat content and fatty acids profiles in seeds of a Polish white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) collection

Variation in digestible energy content of Australian sweet lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) and the development of prediction equations for its estimation1

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About