2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.4993990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of gas filling pressure and operation energy on ion and neutron emission in a medium energy plasma focus device

Abstract: The effects of gas filling pressure and operation energy on deuterium ions and neutrons have been studied in a medium energy plasma focus device, MEPF-12. The deuterium gas filling pressure was varied from 1 to 10 mbar at an operation energy of 9.7 kJ. Also, the operation energy was varied from 3.9 to 9.7 kJ at a deuterium gas filling pressure of 4 mbar. Time resolved emission of deuterium ions was measured using a Faraday cup. Simultaneously, time integrated and time resolved emissions of neutrons were measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At pressures above the optimum pressure, the speed of the deuterons decreased during the post-pinch phase as it has to pass through dense ambient conditions, which will result in less efficient beam-target interaction, leading to a low neutron yield. This has also been observed experimentally using a medium-energy plasma focus device, where a higher number density of deuterium ions with high energies was measured at the optimum filling pressure for a charging voltage, which in turn resulted in a higher neutron yield compared to other filling pressures [60].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…At pressures above the optimum pressure, the speed of the deuterons decreased during the post-pinch phase as it has to pass through dense ambient conditions, which will result in less efficient beam-target interaction, leading to a low neutron yield. This has also been observed experimentally using a medium-energy plasma focus device, where a higher number density of deuterium ions with high energies was measured at the optimum filling pressure for a charging voltage, which in turn resulted in a higher neutron yield compared to other filling pressures [60].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Neutron energies above 2.45 MeV [estimated using the Q value of d(d, 3 He)n nuclear fusion reaction] were due to high energy deuterium ions transferring their additional energy to neutrons according to beam-target fusion mechanism of neutron production [47]. Variation in neutron energy with filling pressure could be attributed to variation in the energy spectrum of deuterium ions as reported earlier [49]. This has also been confirmed from the observed variation in hard x-ray emission which is produced on collision of relativistic electrons with PF anode as discussed above.…”
Section: Experimental Observationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Compared with the neutron energy curve (figure 4), the maximum neutron yield with maximum neutron energy was observed at the same pressure, 4.5 mbar. This could be due to the emission of a high fluence of deuterium ions with high energy at 4.5 mbar which may have resulted in a greater number of d(d, 3 He) n fusion reactions though the beam-target fusion mechanism [30,31,47,49]. Moreover, the experimentally observed neutron yield (maximum as well as average) were found to be larger than the estimated yield.…”
Section: Experimental Observationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The neutron yield increases with increasing filling gas pressure to a maximum value and then decreases with continued increased gas pressure. This variation in neutron yield is attributed to the deuterium ion velocity distribution (transfer of the kinetic energy of compressing plasma into pinch), which is different at various filling pressures for the same operation energy [17]. This behavior of neutron yield is essentially due to proportionality Y b -t ∼ I 2 pinch .n i .V 0.5 max [5,33], and the neutron yield is strongly related to the square of the I pinch and related to n i .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Saw et al [16] used Lee code on three plasma focus machines, FMPF-3, NX2 and NX3, to compute Y n versus pressure, and compared with experimental results, which show good agreement. Niranjan et al [17] studied the effects of deuterium gas as the operating pressure on neutron yield and other characteristics using Lee code for the MEPF-12 device. Marciniak et al [18] determined the total neutron versus the deuterium gas pressure with a neutron model set in Lee code for the PF24 device, and compared it with measured data; a good agreement between measured and computed Y n for lower neutron emission was found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%