2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10526-004-0419-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fungicides and insecticides applied during planting of sugarcane on viability of Metarhizium anisopliae and its efficacy against white grubs

Abstract: The entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin is used for control of white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in sugarcane fields in Queensland, Australia. Eight fungicides and three liquid insecticides are currently registered for application to sugarcane at planting, and may come into contact with M. anisopliae during its application from cane planters. Seven of these were tested for deleterious effects on two isolates of M. anisopliae, FI-147 and FI-1045, in laboratory and field ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Iprodione was also inhibitory to fungal growth in this study while having no adverse effect on CFU numbers when applied to potting media incorporated with M. anisopliae spores. Fungicides used in sugarcane production (prochloraz, propiconazole, flusilazole and methyl ethyl mercuric chloride) also significantly inhibited mycelial growth of M. anisopliae in vitro, but were found be compatible in commercial practice (Samson et al 2005). The activity of M. anisopliae against Ceratitis capitata (Wied.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iprodione was also inhibitory to fungal growth in this study while having no adverse effect on CFU numbers when applied to potting media incorporated with M. anisopliae spores. Fungicides used in sugarcane production (prochloraz, propiconazole, flusilazole and methyl ethyl mercuric chloride) also significantly inhibited mycelial growth of M. anisopliae in vitro, but were found be compatible in commercial practice (Samson et al 2005). The activity of M. anisopliae against Ceratitis capitata (Wied.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, other control means interact with released biocontrol agents and may influence their efficacy. These measures are not limited to synthetic chemicals only (e.g., fertilisers, pesticides; Samson et al, 2005;Jaronski, 2007) but also include natural compounds (e.g., secondary plant metabolites; Shah et al, 2008), and other macro-and microorganisms (Friberg et al, 2005;Acevedo et al, 2007;Jaronski, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used as a biocontrol agent on various types of pests which include elm bark beetle, mosquito larvae, plant hoppers, coconut leaf beetle, rhinoceros beetle, onion thrips, storage cowpea, white grub, cattle tick and also termite species like Reticulitermes spp., Coptotermes formosanus and Odontotermes formosanus [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%