Effect of frontline employee's hope and consumer failure during consumer-created emergencies

Abstract

PurposeIn important interpersonal service interactions with a frontline employee (FLE), consumers at times fail to carry out their share of responsibility in the execution of the service, resulting in a situation of “consumer created emergency”. This might defeat the consumer's goal of availing the service (termed as consumer failure). This study explains the role of employee's hope in managing consumer failure in the situation of consumer created emergencies.Design/methodology/approachHypotheses were tested in three experiments that simulated service emergency across a general printing service situation and a travel service situation.FindingsThe study shows that: (1) FLE hope has a positive effect on consumer satisfaction, and is mediated by the consumer's assumed effort by the FLE; (2) the effect of FLE hope on consumer satisfaction changes with changing levels of consumer hopefulness about the service outcome; (3) despite situation of consumer created emergency, consumer failure results in low consumer satisfaction due to attribution error and (4) external attribution by the FLE could not significantly rectify consumer's attribution error and hence could not alleviate consumer dissatisfaction.Research limitations/implicationsThe study suggests relevance and pathways of managing emotions and attributions of consumers and FLEs for superior performance outcomes.Originality/valueThe study theorizes and tests the role of hope, which is an important positive emotion during emergencies because frontline service settings have heretofore predominantly focused on managing negative traits and outcomes.

Do self-monitors experience less emotional exhaustion? Testing the role of supervisor-rated performance and perceived competitive climate

“…However, in service settings, supervisors do not necessarily differentiate between in-role and extra-role behaviors when rating their subordinates' performance (Liao and Chuang, 2004; see also Kim and Carlson, 2016; Mehra et al , 2001; Lam et al , 1999). This is because service performance expectations surround the customer experience and typically involve an indefinite set of behaviors that help and serve customers (Liao and Chuang, 2004; Ranjan et al , 2021). We argue that this malleability in the customer-service role definition (Morrison, 1994) allows self-monitors to adapt and respond in a variety of ways that they determine to be appropriate to the situation they are attending and to fit in accordingly.…”

Mobile payment service quality: a new approach for continuance intention

“…Theoretical background and hypotheses development 2.1 Continuance intention to use M-payment M-payment conducts transactions via wireless technologies including radio frequency identification (RFID), mobile phone networks, Bluetooth and NFI (Franque et al, 2021). Various M-payment options have become popular, like online shopping apps and mobile wallets (Ranjan et al, 2021). In the Jordanian context, on 1/4/2014, the Jordan Mobile Payment (JoMoPay) app was officially launched, dramatically altering the payment services landscape (CBJ, 2022).…”

“…M-payment conducts transactions via wireless technologies including radio frequency identification (RFID), mobile phone networks, Bluetooth and NFI (Franque et al ., 2021). Various M-payment options have become popular, like online shopping apps and mobile wallets (Ranjan et al. , 2021).…”

Customer perceived quality of life in provider value cocreation: The mediating role of customer value cocreation and the moderating role of customer emotions

“…In addition, recent research has revealed that differences in emotional ability among customers affect attitude formation (Hasford et al, 2018). Perceiving the absence of negative emotion is vital for customers to identify and utilize service encounters, that is, the behavior of frontline service providers on managing negative traits and outcomes (e.g., in a healthcare context, hospital's supportive cocreation practices) (Mattila & Enz, 2002; Ranjan et al, 2021). Accordingly, in the healthcare service context, this study posits that customers who experience the absence of negative emotion are more likely to cope with stress, seek engagement opportunities, and potentially be enabled by PVCC, while customers compounded with negative emotions are less likely to exploit the cocreation opportunities offered by PVCC.…”