1966
DOI: 10.1037/h0023244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of frontal ablation upon conditioned responses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early to middle part of the last century, investigators established that animals could detect electrical currents delivered anywhere in the brain (Loucks, 1935–1936; Konorski & Lubińska, 1939; Doty & Rutledge, 1959; Nielson et al. , 1962; Rutledge & Doty, 1962; Doty, 1965, 1969; Nielson & Davis, 1966; Miller & Glickstein, 1967). To get an animal to respond to electrical stimulation, a reward or an absence of punishment had to follow a motor response (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early to middle part of the last century, investigators established that animals could detect electrical currents delivered anywhere in the brain (Loucks, 1935–1936; Konorski & Lubińska, 1939; Doty & Rutledge, 1959; Nielson et al. , 1962; Rutledge & Doty, 1962; Doty, 1965, 1969; Nielson & Davis, 1966; Miller & Glickstein, 1967). To get an animal to respond to electrical stimulation, a reward or an absence of punishment had to follow a motor response (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those cases where no a priori conformity had been achieved, the extent of lesions was rerated. Basically, each subarea Divac (1968Divac ( ,1969 X X a a a a a x a Lawicka and Konorski (1961) a/x X a/x a a a a X a +-+-- Nielson and Davis (1966) a/x X X X a a a a/x x +---- Numan and Lubar (1974) a/x a/x a a a a a a/x a +++--Stepien (1974) a a X a a a a a X -+--- Stepien et al (1966) a a X a a a a a Warren et al, (1969)h a/x x a a a/x a a/x a/x X 1,2,3 +++++ Warren and Warren (1966)11a/x X a/x a a/x a a/x a/x a/x Warren et al (1961) X X a/x a a/x a a a/x a/x Warren et al (1962) X X a/x a a/x a a a/x a/x 2 ---+- Warren et al (1972) a/x x a/x a a/x a a/x a/x a/x 2 ++-++ Wikmark and Warren (1972) a/x a/x a/x a/x a/x a a/x a/x a/x 2 +++++ Zielinski (1966Zielinski ( , 1970 a/x x a a a a a x a ++-+- Zielinski (1972a) a/x x a a a/x a a x a ++-+- Zielinski (1972b) a/x x a a a/x a a x a Czarkowska (1973, 1974) a IlLesionsare identical with those of Wa"en et al. (1972).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retention of learned avoidance and /or escape react ions is transiently impaired after prefrontal lesions (Nielson & Davis, 1966;Zielinski, 1966Zielinski, , 1970, but the latency of the responses is lengt hened postoperatively over long periods (Zielinski, 1966(Zielinski, , 1970(Zielinski, , 1972a(Zielinski, , b, 1974. The learning defic iency of cats whose prefrontal area has been destr iyed is also transient when learning is conducted in a one-way shuttlebox (Cornwell, 1966), but avoidance in a two-way apparatus (both compartments are occasionally associated with shock) is retarded (Axelrod & Diamond, 1965;Warren et al, 1972) .…”
Section: Other Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When conditioned responses (CRs) were thoroughly learned, conditioning thresholds were established by lowering the intensity of the CS in blocks of five trials ~lntil the CRs dropped out. he intensity at which the animal gave only two out of five CRs was defined as the threshold, a threshold which is stable (Nielson, et al, 1962) and remains so for as long as 2 yr. (Nielson & Davis, 1966). Changes in the CS threshold following drug administration were taken as an indication of changes in the excitability of that brain structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%