“…(4) the inverse relationship between distress and FV consumption will remain for adults from rural and regional areas, but not for adults living in urban areas. This is hypothesised because we expect that fruit and vegetable consumption will be more accessible to those residing in major cities (Backman et al, 2011;Bodor et al, 2008;Leather, 1995;Morland, Wing, & Roux, 2002;Pearson et al, 2005;Zenk et al, 2005). We hypothesise a positive relationship between distress and takeaway consumption frequency only for adults living in major cities, also because of increased access to takeaway food (e.g., Thornton et al, 2011).…”