2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of formation brine on interfacial interaction: Implications for CO2 storage

Johny Mouallem,
Muhammad Arif,
Abubakar Isah
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 87 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is considered an effective and scientifically proven technique for reducing anthropogenic CO 2 emissions in a safe manner. This approach involves the injection of captured CO 2 into suitable subsurface geological formations, such as saline aquifers and depleted oil/gas reservoirs. The secure confinement of CO 2 within these geological media is facilitated through various trapping mechanisms, including residual trapping, structural trapping, dissolution trapping, and mineral trapping. Notably, shale formations and unmineable coal seams have also been tested for their suitability for geological storage of CO 2 . Coal seams and shales can trap enormous volumes of CO 2 via adsorption trapping. , Particularly, the injection of CO 2 into the coal seams has been receiving increasing attention due to its dual advantages in geological CO 2 storage and enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) recovery. Coal seams have also been tested for their suitability for hydrogen (H 2 ) storage in the context of the transition toward clean energy . Indeed, studies have shown the potential of H 2 adsorption in coals as well, albeit much lower than CO 2 . , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is considered an effective and scientifically proven technique for reducing anthropogenic CO 2 emissions in a safe manner. This approach involves the injection of captured CO 2 into suitable subsurface geological formations, such as saline aquifers and depleted oil/gas reservoirs. The secure confinement of CO 2 within these geological media is facilitated through various trapping mechanisms, including residual trapping, structural trapping, dissolution trapping, and mineral trapping. Notably, shale formations and unmineable coal seams have also been tested for their suitability for geological storage of CO 2 . Coal seams and shales can trap enormous volumes of CO 2 via adsorption trapping. , Particularly, the injection of CO 2 into the coal seams has been receiving increasing attention due to its dual advantages in geological CO 2 storage and enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) recovery. Coal seams have also been tested for their suitability for hydrogen (H 2 ) storage in the context of the transition toward clean energy . Indeed, studies have shown the potential of H 2 adsorption in coals as well, albeit much lower than CO 2 . , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%