DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-12037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of forage addition to the diet on rumen development in calves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calves fed with wheat straw throughout the preweaning period had higher feed consumptions than the calves fed with alfalfa hay. Complying with the findings of earlier studies (Beharka et al 1998;Booth 2003;Coverdale et al 2004;Suarez et al 2007), use of low quality roughage instead of high quality roughage in rations increased daily feed consumptions throughout the preweaning period. However, current findings conflict with those observed by Castells et al (2012) who observed greater DFC in calves fed with WS than DAH.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calves fed with wheat straw throughout the preweaning period had higher feed consumptions than the calves fed with alfalfa hay. Complying with the findings of earlier studies (Beharka et al 1998;Booth 2003;Coverdale et al 2004;Suarez et al 2007), use of low quality roughage instead of high quality roughage in rations increased daily feed consumptions throughout the preweaning period. However, current findings conflict with those observed by Castells et al (2012) who observed greater DFC in calves fed with WS than DAH.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Grass and legume hay and straw are common sources of fiber in the diet of the young calf. The quality of these forage sources greatly affects the palatability and the digestibility of the diet (Booth 2003). Differences in feed quality attributes were numerically assessed thorough relative feed value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hill et al [15] reported that feeding either 2.5 and 5% of chopped timothy hay linearly reduced starter intake, ADG, empty body weight ADG, and FE. The quality of forage significantly influences the digestibility and the palatability of the diet [46]. Ülger et al [47] compared two calf total mixed ration (TMR) diets with either 20% of a high-quality alfalfa hay (CP = 18.1%, acid detergent fiber (ADF) = 36.1% and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) = 44.4% on DM basis, relative feed value (RFV) = 127.2) or lower quality wheat straw (CP = 3.7%, ADF = 52.4% and NDF = 80.1% on DM basis, RFV = 55.9) and found that the high-quality roughage improved FE and numerically increased ADG during the preweaning period.…”
Section: Forage Level and Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high cost of conventional feed, nutritionists have been forced to search about protein sources alternatives to formulate the cost effective rations, especially those drived from leguminous forage species. So, the sources of high -quality roughage can play a vital role in the ruminant's diet and affect positively on palatability and digestibility of the diet (Chriyaa et al, 1997 andBooth, 2003), thereby reducing production costs, (Ben Salem et al, 2004), and improving the stability of production systems (Roggero et al, 1996). Cubic or pelleted Alfalfa hay is one of the inexpensive sources of protein and could be performed better than those of oilseed meals in ruminants diet (Cochran et al, 1986;DelCurto et al, 1990a) and also improved growth rate and maintain animals health (Waghorn et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%