2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-017-4714-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of footshock stress on place conditioning produced by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and the fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor, URB597, in Sprague-Dawley rats

Abstract: Unlike the effect of footshock on THC- and URB597-induced anxiolytic effects, footshock does not promote THC or URB597-induced reward in a conditioned place preference paradigm. However, footshock stress reverses the sedative effects of 1 mg/kg THC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systemic anandamide administration fails to induce CPP or CPA (Scherma et al , 2008a; Méndez-Díaz et al , 2012), possibly reflecting its low bioavailability due to chemical instability and metabolism mediated by FAAH and other enzymes. A similar result was observed after systemic administration of compounds that increases endogenous anandamide levels through inhibition of its reuptake or hydrolysis (Gobbi et al , 2005; Bortolato et al , 2006; Scherma et al, 2008a,b; Gamaleddin et al , 2013; DeVuono et al , 2017). However, when animals were pretreated with a FAAH inhibitor, anandamide induced CPA, which was prevented by CB 1 antagonism (Scherma et al , 2008a).…”
Section: Cannabinoids and Place Conditioningsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Systemic anandamide administration fails to induce CPP or CPA (Scherma et al , 2008a; Méndez-Díaz et al , 2012), possibly reflecting its low bioavailability due to chemical instability and metabolism mediated by FAAH and other enzymes. A similar result was observed after systemic administration of compounds that increases endogenous anandamide levels through inhibition of its reuptake or hydrolysis (Gobbi et al , 2005; Bortolato et al , 2006; Scherma et al, 2008a,b; Gamaleddin et al , 2013; DeVuono et al , 2017). However, when animals were pretreated with a FAAH inhibitor, anandamide induced CPA, which was prevented by CB 1 antagonism (Scherma et al , 2008a).…”
Section: Cannabinoids and Place Conditioningsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Rewarding effects (CPP) tend to occur at low doses (Braida et al , 2004; Le Foll et al , 2006) and depend not only on CB 1 receptor activation, but also on recruitment of endogenous opioid mechanisms (Braida et al , 2004). In contrast, aversion (CPA) is more commonly observed with high THC doses (Sañudo-Peña et al , 1997; Hutcheson et al , 1998; Cheer et al , 2000; Quinn et al , 2008; DeVuono et al , 2017). In addition to the dose, various other parameters may interfere with THC effects.…”
Section: Cannabinoids and Place Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In rodents, Δ 9 -THC alone is not self-administered [ 49 , 50 ], although the mixture of Δ 9 -THC and cannabidiol was recently reported to be self-administered by rats [ 51 , 52 ]. In conditioned place preference (CPP) test, Δ 9 -THC typically produces conditioned place aversion [ 53 , 54 ], although place preferences have also been reported [ 55 , 56 ]. In electrical intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) experiments, Δ 9 -THC was initially reported to facilitate electrical ICSS in rats [ 56 , 57 , 58 ], while other studies found suppression of ICSS in rats and mice [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ].…”
Section: Cannabinoid Reward Versus Aversionmentioning
confidence: 99%